What is not readily recognized. Fuhrman lied about when the photographs -- numbers 34 & 35 -- were taken by Rokahr. This opens the door to investigating The Fuhrman Timeline and future charges of "Tampering with Evidence". The nature of the charge, and the phrasing of the Plea Bargain, preclude the possibility of Double Jeopardy.
Is the Bronco location important? After failing to establish the three most important facts, Christopher Darden wrote:
"What we really wanted to know was where was he at the time of the murders, right? Where was that Bronco?
As for the third most imprtant fact -- the time of the murders -- Darden continues to assert:
"We'd successfully pinpointed the time of the murders to around ten-fifteen, giving Simpson more than enough time to catch his flight." page 245
Clearly, if Petrocelli holds to this dilusion, he'll lose all credibility before the Civil Trial jury.
What's most surprising, if you think about it, is how the prosecutors - the losers - can write best-selling books. In a country that celebrates winning, Chris Darden and Marcia Clark have actually won by losing. Mike Littwin - The Baltimore Sun "...Mark Fuhrman and the content of those tapes is the subject for another day and another forum, and it clearly will be. It's clear to everyone that it will be. This will not be swept under the rug. We have no fear of that."
-- Marcia Clark, 29 August 1995Until ALL the evidence is in, and the truth known, this forum will continue.
Darden admitted that during a private exchange, Cochran urged him to steer clear of former Los Angeles police detective Mark Fuhrman as a witness.
"Cochran knew ... about the racist tapes Fuhrman made ..., and I think he was honestly trying to warn me away," Darden writes in his book. "Perhaps he felt badly over what he'd done to my reputation..."
"People there don't want niggers in their town. People there don't want Mexicans in their town. They don't want anybody but good people in their town, and anyway you can do to get them out of there that's fine with them. We have no niggers where I grew up."
"Now, it's funny because guys in Internal Affairs go, `Mark, you can do just about anything. ... We'd love to investigate just some `good 'ol boy' ...'"
"I'm the key witness in the biggest case of the century. And, if I go down, they lose the case. The glove is everything. Without the glove -- bye, bye."
Blood to the left of the footprints?
Contrary to Fuhrman's assumption, the killer might NOT have been wounded.
Effective 2 October 1996,
Mark Fuhrman is now a CONVICTED FELON
To those who believe Simpson "Guilty"
All testimony and "state of mind" evidence related to Mark Fuhrman will be linked at Fuhrman's opportunity.
The police timeline begins with 13 June 1994, prior to 10:00 AM.
Common Questions associated with the planting of the glove are address as part of Fuhrman's Means, Motive and Opportunity.
Nicole Brown Simpson
In a conversation with Cora Fischman, Nicole said, "Cora, we're the ones screwed up, not O.J., not Ron {Fischman}. It's us. 99 percent of women would love to have what we have."
Our servers are provided by Geocitiess to whom we are exceedingly grateful.
Our thanks to: Source Interactive Network, LLC, for the use of their HTML & Graphics editing facilities.
© 1995 wlschreck@aol.com © 1995 Source Interactive Network, LLC. All rights reserved.
Return to: Capitol Hill 1400 block CapitolHill
A Few Visitor Stats:
In our FIRST HUNDRED DAYS: 10,000 visitors
Member of the Internet Link Exchange | Free Home Pages at GeoCities |
Mirsky is very astute, there has been a tendancy among some to think I meant "indict". Others have asserted that, "INDITE" is not a word -- but they also assert that Simpson is a murderer.
indite (in'dit), v., -dited, -diting. put in words or writing; compose, as a letter, poem, etc. [OF enditer L in- in + dictare DICTATE, express in writing] --in-dite'ment, n. inditer, n.When creating the TITLE I was confronted with the standard authors problem: How does one express a concept, or series of concepts, in the minimum number of words? In this case, "To express in writing" the allegations, and evidence, which could justify the INDICTMENT of Detective Mark Furman -- for, Tampering with evidence in a capital case. These charges were alluded to during the Simpson Criminal Trial, and now continue to dog former Detective Fuhrman. By the nature of the Tampering accusation, we are required to deal with the underlying trial -- the Bundy murders -- to determine if and when evidence was tampered with.
A verdict of Not Guilty has been rendered in the Criminal Matter; a civil matter is pending -- which levels the exact same charge: MURDER These pages express in writing that which will be explored in the Civil Matter, and possibly will confront Fuhrman in a court of law.
Previously, I stated that Mirsky was astute; in a personal note, he stated:When dealing with such a "dry" subject as murder, one should always take pains to maintain both sense of humour, and objectivity.
"..., your use of indite is hilarious and I hope you keep doing it."