| Reasons why most Liberals are wrong about the Iraq situation:
-Liberals want to wait until another 3,000 Americans are killed by terrorists, before we can attack Iraq, a country that does harbor terrorists and weapons of mass destruction. (Sorry big guy, but Iraq has no link to 9-11 or Al Queda)
-Many Liberals have completely forgotten and ignored
the men and women who died on 9/11, and the families that lost close ones. (Where’s Bin Laden? Why are there under 10,000 troops in Afghanistan and 300,000 in Iraq? Why is the Taliban and Al Queda still a threat? Why can’t our first responders get any federal funding? No liberals are responsible for any of that)
-Liberals think that Inspections work.....Hahahahahahahah. Those inspectors couldn't remove a water pistol if they tryed. Saddam still has enough chemical weapons to kill many more than 3,000. (Yea, and were starting a war that will kill 500,000. During the 1st Gulf War very few weapons were destroyed, they were destroyed in the inspections afterwards. These inspections were working till Bush got an itchy trigger finger and had to launch some missiles at Iraqi civilians)
-Liberals think we should give inspectors more time, which basically gives saddam more time to give al qaeda terrorists weapons of mass destruction, and more time kill americans with those weapons. (He’s had 12 years to give his weapons to Al Queda, he’s not going to do it when he’s surrounded by spy planes and inspectors, and while the inspectors are destroying his weapons)
- We cannot give terrorists time to regroup. In a war on terrorism, you always have to keep terrorists on the run, and we know Iraq has terrorist cells, and any country that harbors terrorists will not be tolerated. (So we need to declare war on Syria, Saudi Arabia, and Pakistan? Bombing the hell out of Baghdad won’t make the world safe from terrorism, if anything it will increase terrorism)
-Liberals think that all republicans care about is Iraq; hmmmmm..... The liberal bias media is the one that focus on Iraq, not Republicans. Bush talked about other issues more than Iraq in his state of the union address. (Bush spent half his speech not talking about Iraq, what’s your point? It’s a state of the union not state of the military. The media is completely conservative, that’s why there all aboard for Bush’s war on Iraq, and denounce anyone who speaks out against it)
- Some Liberals, not all, believe that Saddam is not a direct threat to the US.Anyone who harbors al qaeda terrorists, nuclear weapons, and gases over 500,000 people is direct threat to the US and the world order. (Well that’s great, but too bad Saddam doesn’t have nuclear weapons, and never gassed 500,000 people, and is one of many countries who harbor Al Queda terrorists)
|