Have you.....or I myself.....ever had any [not-necessary-genital-connection] sexual contacts of any types with [at least one] totally-naked masseuse, escort, playmate, opposite-sex friend, call girl, streetwalker, hooker, prostitute.....and/or have we (at least one time) masturbationally lusted looking at one or several strippers in a nude-dancers bar or at porn photos or videos in magazines or on the internet? If so, did we ever see them more than once, or go back to that or those same one or ones again? If we did or did not do so, do we wonder what ever happened to the young women as to where they are now, what they are now doing, what condition they are in financially, medically, educationally, vocationally, and spiritually? If so, are we curious as to discover who they now belong to, whether they are presently married or not, if they would want to contact us (again), and if so, contact us sexually without charge this time, and/or be willing to begin a more frequent relationship with us if they are still single and willing to do such?

Perhaps a weird re-wording of phenomenally-paraphrased Scripture verses might illucidate the matter:

Mt 21:31 = Which of the two did the will of his father?" They said, "The first." Jesus said to them, "Truly, I say to you, the tax collectors and the harlots go into the kingdom of God before you.

Mt 22:28 = In the resurrection, therefore, to which of the seven will she be [harlotrous masseuse]? For they all had her."
Mt 22:30 = For in the resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like angels in heaven.

Mr 12:23 = In the resurrection whose [harlotrous masseuse] will she be? For the seven had her as [harlotrous masseuse]."

Lu 20:33 = In the resurrection, therefore, whose [harlotrous masseuse] will the woman be? For the seven had her as [harlotrous masseuse]."

Ro 7:3 = Accordingly, she will be called an adulteress if she [has sex with] another [john] while her [previous john] is still alive. But if her [previous john] dies, she is free from that law, and if she [has sex with] another [john] she is [an unfaithful VD-inviting whoring slut].

1Co 6:16 = Do you not know that he who joins himself to a prostitute becomes one body with her? For, as it is written, "The two shall become one flesh."

1Co 7:39 = A [harlotrous masseuse] is bound to her [john] as long as [he lives]. If the [john] dies, she is free to [have sex with] whomever she wishes, only in the Lord.
1Co 7:40 = But in my judgment she is happier if she remains as she is. And I think that I have the Spirit of God.

1Ti 5:11 = But refuse to enroll younger-women widows, for when they grow wanton against Christ they desire to marry,
1Ti 5:12 = and so they incur condemnation for having violated their first [john].

[Sorry about the massive paraphrasing above. Hesitate quoting those verses verbatim as stated to anyone. Separate the wheat from the previously-stated chaff, and do your best to get the most out of it all!]

Though almost impossible, it would be ideal for a non-married male human who is older than age 2 to never observe any human female of any age partially or completely naked (clearly I promote midwives)......and then at age 20 both young-man and young-woman virgins to meet and get married to other, then promptly engage in marital activities described within the Song of Solomon and indirectly but obviously suggested elsewhere throughout the Old Testament.

Theoretically, several unique things would phenomenally occur.

First, although both of them would have encountered the reasonably-graphic and legitimately sexually-explicit parts of the New and especially the Old Testament of The HOLY BIBLE, they would have nothing pictoral of representational imagery or actual-body display (except viewing their own bodies) to relate to those mere words. Thus, self-sodomizing masturbation of both would (almost unbelievably) never occur, because there would be no need for such to occur, being there would be no "pre-awakening of love" as referred to in:

So 2:7 = I adjure you, O daughters of Jerusalem, by the gazelles or the hinds of the field, that you stir not up nor awaken love until it please.
So 3:5 = I adjure you, O daughters of Jerusalem, by the gazelles or the hinds of the field, that you stir not up nor awaken love until it please.
So 8:4 = I adjure you, O daughters of Jerusalem, that you stir not up nor awaken love until it please.

As a result, the penis of the man and the vagina of the woman would have been subjected to absolutely no pre-marital functional sexual use nor abuse, and (in the case of the newly-married man) the easy-entry small but growing size of the penis, the stiffness during erections, number of repeated erections, and duration of each erection, would be maximized.....while increasing gradual enlargement of the prostate over time and especially when elderly would be minimized. Consistent, repeated, and thorough orgasmic climaxing for the woman would be as good as it could get. Foreplay, insertions and frolicking intercourse, and afterplay would be most relaxing, gentler, more passionate, satisfyingly prolonged, with as appreciative of closely-studied and intensely-fondled newly-exhibited body parts of all types as could be.

In the early history of the United States, though painting and sculptures of nude women were prevalent in Europe, and paintings of nudes hung over bars in Old-West saloons, women generally were dressed quite modestly similar to old-order Catholic nuns and amish. Though not robed and shawled with islamic hijab dresswear, recall the old-time black-and-white photos of your own great-great-great-great-great grandmothers of the 1800s and very early 1900s with their chignoned hairstyles, long-sleeved full-length skirts, and boots for even summerwear. Nevertheless, such non-prudish, public-Bible-reading-in-public-schools people had large families (the composer and musician Bach is said to have had 20 children he fathered!), although that is related of course to the absence of contraception, in obedience to:

1Ti 5:14 = So I want younger women [Gr. ne(o)teras] to marry, bear children, manage their households, and give the enemy no cause to revile us.

Now, several things are of note pertaining to not only the Song of Solomon and its contents, but also other parts of particularly the Old Testament's sacred and holy, graphic and sexually-oriented verses wherever they occur here and there.

First of all, in stark contrast to steamy and racy, pornographic paperback sex novels, the Song of Solomon does not get that graphic or explicit. For example, there is never any specific reference whatsoever to a woman's buttocks nor pubic hair nor vulva nor vagina nor anus nor clitoris between her crotch. However, vague reference is made to her [pubic?] hair in:

Eze 16:7 = and grow up like a plant of the field.' And you grew up and became tall and arrived at full maidenhood; your breasts were formed, and your hair had grown; yet you were naked and bare.

and the vagina is vaguely referred to in:

Ho 13:13 = The pangs of childbirth come for him, but he is an unwise son; for now he does not present himself at the mouth of the womb [RSV].

The bride's veiled eyes are described first in the Song of Solomon with the non-explicit comparisons of:

So 1:15 = Behold, you are beautiful, my love; behold, you are beautiful; your eyes are doves.
So 4:1 = Behold, you are beautiful, my love, behold, you are beautiful! Your eyes are doves behind your veil. Your hair is like a flock of goats, moving down the slopes of Gilead.

The most graphic description of [probably unveiled] eyes occurs towards the end of the book:

So 7:4 = Your neck is like an ivory tower. Your eyes are pools in Heshbon, by the gate of Bathrabbim. Your nose is like a tower of Lebanon, overlooking Damascus.

The bride's breasts are never elaborated on as to the presence of nipples within the Song of Solomon. A woman's nipples exposed for immorality are, however, mentioned in:

Eze 23:3 = And they fornicated in Egypt; in their youth they fornicated. Their breasts were handled, and there their virgin nipples were pressed.
Eze 23:8 = And she did not leave her fornications from Egypt. For they lay with her in her youth, and they pressed her virgin nipples and poured their fornications on her.
Eze 23:21 = So you longed for the wickedness of your youth, when from Egypt they pressed your nipples, for the sake of the breasts of your youth.

Throughout the Song of Solomon, this re-occurring yet not-really-overly-titillating phrase suffices for observation and description of the woman's breasts:

So 4:5 = Your two breasts are like two fawns, twins of a gazelle, that feed among the lilies.
So 7:3 = Your two breasts are like two fawns, twins of a gazelle.

However, in chapter 7, we now have this additional reference to her breasts, and male response to such:

So 7:7 = You are stately as a palm tree, and your breasts are like its clusters.
So 7:8 = I say I will climb the palm tree and lay hold of its branches. Oh, may your breasts be like clusters of the vine, and the scent of your breath like apples

But, so as not to be inordinately turned on by ever-increasing elaboration, we read next:

So 8:8 = We have a little sister, and she has no breasts. What shall we do for our sister, on the day when she is spoken for?

In the original Hebrew Text, and in sharp contrast to some overly-explicit English mistranslations of Song of Solomon 7:1, even a woman's feet are only mentioned once:

So 5:3 = I had put off my garment, how could I put it on? I had bathed my feet, how could I dirty them?
So 7:1 = How graceful are your "feet" in sandals, royal maiden! Your rounded thighs are like jewels, the work of a master hand.

The word "feet" used in many English mis-renditions of Song 7:1 is overly-graphic mistranslation, and should instead read:

So 7:1 = How beautiful are your footsteps in sandals, O prince's daughter! The roundings of your thighs are like jewels, the work of the artisan's hands.

Thus, even in the Bible itself alone, there is enough operating-manual info to get a newly-married couple going sexually.....without any previous nor additional demonic substitutions nor pornographic or immoral impositions to cause premature ejaculation and related dysfunctional wicked and evil aberrations.