There are two types of sexual communication: wanted or non-wanted.

The wanted involves deliberate or accidental seduction on the part of either a human male or a human female to a specific human female or a human male, respectively, and responded to consentually by that female or male.

The NON-wanted involves deliberate or accidental harassment on the part of either a human male or a human female to EITHER at large OR a specific human female or a human male, respectively, and objected to NON-consentually by that female or male.

How one can correctly analyze and predict whether sexually-oriented presentations will be considered "legitimate seduction" or instead "illegal and unlawful harassment" depends upon:

(a) the detected marital status of the solicited target (such as 4th-finger engagement or wedding-band rings)
(b) the type of sexually-oriented intercourse (of whatever stage and degree) solicited for (involving the gender of the targeted), and
(c) carefully-observed and honestly-admitted response of the targeted to the sexual-solicitation encounter.

ANY sexual communication of any human to their same gender is ALWAYS wrong - whether responded to consentually or objected to non-consentually....because of the non-questionable Scripturally-confirmed wickedness of homosexual solicitation and behavior.

Heterosexual solicitation can be:

(1) non-semantically visual
(2) semantically visual, and/or
(3) tactile

Examples of (1) above would be showing a specific member of the opposite sex NON-worded pictoral imagery (preferably of themselves alone) suggesting their own sexual contact with generally-exposable body parts and/or any-and-all body parts of the specific member....and/or showing a specific member of the opposite sex their own life-sized, in-motion, non-worded, generally-exposable or all-exposed body parts for the same purpose.

Examples of (2) above would be verbally or in writing soliciting a specific member of the opposite sex to do some sexual behavior for the solicitor (e.g. asking them to undress, and/or requesting them to allow undressing and/or fondling) involving generally-exposable or any-and-all body parts of that specific member....usually with at least temporary and some reasonably-predictable privacy alone with them.

Examples of (3) above would be for an aggressive solicitor, seducer, or seductress to handhold, lap-sit, cheek-kiss, and/or even lip-kiss, unclothe, reach under clothing, and/or fondle either generally-exposable or even any-and-all body parts of an obviously-consentual and in-no-way-seriously-objecting single member of the opposite sex.

Typically nowadays in America and largely elsewhere throughout the Western and non-Middle-Eastern world, what is generally-exposable (though not from a Biblical perspective) are the neck, shoulders, back, belly, hips (for the most part), partial buttocks (if thong underwear or bikini is worn), thighs, legs, and feet. What is NOT generally exposed in open general-public view (even in a typical legal sense) are bare-nippled breasts on a woman, crotch, and complete buttocks.

Within the geographical and cultural areas previously mentioned, to engage in (1) and/or (2)and/or (3) of generally-exposable body parts of any consentually-aged person (infants not included) does not usually involve the extent of matrimonial commitment that occurs when (1) and/or (2) and/or (3) are done on any-and-all body parts of the truly-consentual opposite sex of whatever non-infantile age.

Of significant note is the utter absurdity and lewd ridiculousness of particularly a human female or group of them exhibiting to the heterosexual public-AT-LARGE indecent, improperly-attired, or non-attired hairstyle (i.e. mopheadedness of loose long hair longer than mouth-level) and/or sleeveslessness, slackslessness, sockslessness.....for the simple reason that such non-solicited aberration is forced against males in general with or without ONE specific one targeted, along with the lack of opportunity for such males-at-large to respond (either as a group, or instead one-at-a-time) with consentual sexual communication to the one or ones either carelessly and irresponsibly or arrogantly and maliciously harassing (and not legitimately seducing) them.