THAT is the way the LORD originally intended MARRIED couples to publicly live together AMONG NEIGHBORS similarly nude in open public view [as incomprehensible as that now seems to be in our present civilized society].

According to the historical record of Genesis 3:21 God eventually added to or replaced INADEQUATE fig-leaf aprons with something more "suitable" - obviously implying that continued PUBLIC exposure of female bare breasts (alluded to in Proverbs chapter 5 and elsewhere) plus bare buttocks (cited in Isaiah chapter 20) and which by implication was not covered by manmade fig leaves.....was NOT acceptable!

As if accidental or deliberate exposure of humans of their own and each other's sexually-arousing nudity was not enough to get them to erotically connect genitally and consequentially procreate, the Bible of the Lord itself is sufficiently full of graphic-enough references to nudity and erotica relating to such to remind people that nudity and resultant applications still exist, should be both exposed and hidden and exposed, while such references themselves present an advertisement or incentive by merely mentioning nudity to do just that.

As a logical result, we presently have several billion people who have eagerly and fervently acted in accord with physical nudity presentations of their own and others plus written Biblical references in wholehearted obedience of God to "be fruitful and multiply."

Regarding biological-clock-necessity sexual INSTINCT in human beings, love certainly is "as strong as death" and "a most vehement flame of the LORD" which cannot be quenched (to literally quote Hebrew-to-English translation of the Song of Solomon 8:6) -- not only for intensely-passionate and sensuously-sensitive teens and young adults, but even the older folk.

Therefore, in discussing any allowing, permitting, directing, controlling, sublimating, inhibiting, and promoting nudity-related sexually-oriented public or private imagery which have the titillating effect of "awakening love" (as Song of Solomon 8:4 puts it) or "turning people on," "inciting them to sensuality," etc.....FAIR and SENSIBLE leaders and followers must provide for common, natural, and typical expression of quite-understandable FLESHLY fulfilment utilizing whatever noble means they can: such as well-subsidized, respectable and efficient, Christian-oriented, spouse-acquisition, mate-selection facilitators and services......copiously advertised and easily accessible to and for the erotically hungry sensually-starving general public!

ONLY if then when THAT is done will leaders and followers be successful in restricting, prohibiting, and eradicating lust-not-love shenanigans of those who impenitently and relentlessly refuse to accomodate to acceptable, decent, and worthy erotica.....and instead produce ONLY what is morally profitable for the benefit of all - rather than seductive poison which hinders, thwarts, stifles, makes dirty and unclean, defiles, paralyzes and cripples the innocent and their sexual wellbeing (physically, mentally, and spiritually).

Unfortunately, both ANTI-MARRIAGE ANTI-PUBLIC-MODESTY prudish moralistic religious counselors and crusaders plus promiscuity-advocating sex therapists and libertarians are woefully inept to stop the spread of AIDS and VD, teen pregnancy, disorderly lewd conduct exhibitionism, consequential self-sodomizing masturbation....and genuinely satisfy guilty but desperate individuals feasting on polluted sexual garbage in half-discontented, apprehensive, hurried, and fearful disappointment. Such one-sided anti-Bible legalists [on BOTH sides of the spectrum] are not capable of nor authorized to not only eliminate porn but even define what it is!

Without Scriptural guidance, "community standards" are ANYONE's [usually wrong or insufficient] OPINION in contradiction and conflict against everyone else's.

WITH Scriptural guidance, defining both public immodesty (and resulting imagery of that called "porn") becomes a rather simple matter - if one takes the Word of the Lord literally relating to non-foolish, non-facetious, non-weaselword, non-demented, and non-twisted definitions and applications of English dictionary words associated with the Bible.

Along those Righteous and Holy Guidebook lines, blatant examples of indecent immodesty, obscenity, [whatever one wants to term it without getting hung up with nitpicky pseudo-definitions] can be mentioned.

In the opening verses of the KJV or NASV or RSV translation of Isaiah chapter 47 [which contains admonishment to some virgin daughter of Babylon and daughter of the Chaldeans - whoever or whatever THAT alludes to] the LORD through Isaiah orders the female or females in question to "...uncover the leg..." resulting in "nakedness being exposed" and "shame seen."

Of course, the dull of understanding might question how [if at all] uncovering female legs relates in ANY stretch of the imagination to nakedness and shame. Maybe we are here encountering meaningless metaphors, symbols, figurative nothingness vaguely relating in some sexually-suggestive or perverted and impolitely-embarrassing way to pagan astrological idol worship.

But perhaps not.

It seems that Christ/Isaiah [in particularly chapter 47 verses 1-4] is commanding one or more arrogant young women (plus perhaps their progenie) of a society of reputational perverted people to do what (she) is wanton to do (herself) anyway -- which is leave the royal-household security of being an obedient-to-father or obedient-to-husband domestic princess and queen of the house.....and instead "get out on her own." Run away from home. "Be her own boss" (without the authority, counsel, and protection of father or husband while still a submissive daughter or wife). Get herself an "education" with school loans up to her whatever. Become a hippy flower child sitting on the ground in meditative yoga-like stupor. Grinding out whatever in the factory, on the assembly line, store, office, etc. while being a sexually-harassing irritation and competition against men in the workplace. Uncovering her shameful leg nakedness with shortened office skirts and especially at public beaches during warm summer days. Superstitiously and gullibly worshipping the sorcery of psychics and astrological signs of the zodiac. Verse 4 of Isaiah 47 reveals that retaliation by God against such nationally-defiling mistress is just, and the Redeemer and Holy One of Israel retains superiority and sovereignty in His sacred-purity purposes in spite of rebellious inferior-gender seaker-sex wicked ones.

Also flaunted during summer warmth and for male-viewed athletics are SLEEVELESSNESS (violating godly tradition of long-sleeved long-robed decency alluded to in RSV's and NASV's II Samuel 13:18)...exposing NAKED LEGS with shorts, shortened/slitted skirts or "swim"-wear (contrary to the implications of Isaiah 47:1-4)....exhibiting BAREFOOTEDNESS of various types and degrees wearing sandals or clogs without socks or boots...and last but not least that particularly-during-winter LOOSE-LONG-HAIRED MOPHEADEDNESS and other overly-erotic hairstyles silently shoved in-your-face by PSEUDO-angelic wolves in sheep's clothing.

Such live, full-sized, in-person, walking or sitting or jogging semi-porn-in-the-flesh is then photographed into school yearbooks, family albums, portraits, on and in "glamor" magazines, during televised "beauty" pageants, during TV commercials, on the cheerleading sidelines of sports games, for Olympic gymnastics, sitcoms, soaps, newspaper ads, and so on -- all needless, useless, wasted, valueless sexual harassment forced on and against the opposite sex who neither asks for nor wants it, but can do little about it except react with impatient resentment and non-cooperative withdrawal or hostile aggression and assult.

What is particularly damnable about it is that such diabolical sexual harassment is supposedly protected by law...and is anonymous. Untouchable. One does not have the freedom under law to go up to misdressed women and girls on the street, shopping center, or church and mention that and how their misdress is irritating and sexually harassing them. And if one does, a defiant and rude remark maybe spiked with some self-justifying twisted doctrine-of-demon excuse and irrationalization is tersely spewed out, or a quick and angry cellphone call to the police impulsively made, or even demon-possessed slap on the face is a likely outcome!

This is where high-heeled-nude strip and dance bars plus porn in print and on internet compensate.....being that such (in contrast to the sexually-satanic devastation mentioned in the previous paragraphs) is not so anonymous nor randomly and sadistically terroristic, but instead is localized, stable, regulateable as to location, types, times, and costs. Yet, both of the previously-mentioned get blamed for being at fault and that which is dirty, perverted, and in many cases, illegal. Worse yet, men (NOT the women who willingly pose) are blamed as abusive predators.

Please understand that I am NOT supporting either almost-all-nude danceresses in bars NOR printed/internet porn by saying such...but I AM most certainly stating the plain fact that masseuses, strippers in bars, and printed/internet porn is FAR more predictable and more under the DIRECT CONTROL OF MEN to either indulge or not indulge when and where and how THEY and they ALONE want it. And I AM stating that of the two basic types of immodesty and indecency, the partial semi-porn misdress of summertime mopheaded, sleeveless, bare-legged, and sockless-sandal-footed [freely roaming around, terroristically inflicting careless or deliberate harassment]....in contrast to privately-enclosed-in-house mostly-nude danceress and printed/internet porn....is [by far] T H E worse, REALLY obscene, licentuously-lascivious, PERVERTED-GUTTER FILTH which is lewd, dirty, perverted, inappropriate, and despicably unclean.

Having established the above firmly in you the reader's mind, we can now proceed to porn websites.

Some erotic websites forthrightly admit that they contain female-adult nudity, but go on to say that if you don't want to see that nudity, do not Enter, or that the nudity has not been deemed pornographic, or you must be over 18 to view it, etc. But such websites are automatically pornographic, because they cannot enforce gender and age restriction as to who and of what age can click into such obscenity. Thus, even though porn webmasters claim that it is not THEIR responsibility to prohibit access against those who should not see porn, they are (by default) to blame for being not able to prohibit those who should not see porn.

In a public library, it is also the fault of librarians who do not closely, continuously, and intensively monitor porn-seekers. It is the fault of browser and internet-service-provider technicians who set up the server and browser to accept porn pics on the internet. It is the fault of browser creators to not create automatic-censorship software. It is the fault of search engines to allow both already-known and new porn listings. It is the fault of secular-government lawyers and judges and juries to not define what exactly "porn" IS according to obvious and plain BIBLE-verse standards. It is the fault of anti-morality "civil-rights" groups who condemn and disturb court personnel who DO establish and not "impose" Scriptural definitions of porn and immodesty.

And why not place library computer monitor screens facing walls within partitioned semi-enclosures so that single and solitary purveyors can peruse accidently or deliberately-encountered porn in private and not disturb either other patrons or librarians?

The far-reaching consequence of viewing and lusting at both live-person semi-porn during summertime and more severe porn in print or on the internet is eternal torture in outer-darkness hellfire apart from the presence of God.

More immediate and temporal consequences range from short-circuiting the drive to date to marry or romance one's spouse properly....to engaging in self-sodomizing masturbational self-abuse with all the limpid-and-flaccid impotency and prostate cancer associated therewith, along with desensitivity and unappreciation of the delicate and finer aspects of human semi-nudity along with inability to respond tenderly, affectionately, and patiently - resorting instead to impatient and insensitive, forced, rape-like, sexual approach.

At this point, it is expedient to place much blame pertaining to semi-porn and porn on those disorderly-conduct public-nuisance gals who consciously and deliberately pose for it (exhibiting themselves as luridly-selfish, greedy-for-quick/easy-money, rebels of naughtiness). Those who are "the little foxes who spoil the vineyards" who need to be "caught" (Song of Solomon 2:15) because they "stir up and awaken love before it please" (Song of Solomon 2:7) to the detriment of both male-stag and female-doe "gazelles of the field" (Song of Solomon 3:5).

Finally, PUBLIC-view nude pictures, sculptures, paintings, photographs, drawings, holograms, and websites of FEMALE humans (of whatever age) is for other FEMALE humans (of whatever age)....not for MALE humans (of any non-infant age) not presently married to them.