Particularly by individuals and groups who have tried to subversively and demonically compete against truthful broadcasting entities......but have miserably failed......advocacy of the so-called "Fairness Doctrine" (enforceable by the FCC) has been imposed into the arena of public debate.

What some call "conservative talk radio" has had a serious and extensive influence on the selection and election and appointment of political candidates and government officials....and the "liberal" enemies against such talk-show hosts, their vocal audiences, and their policies want the opposing side to be given equal opportunity and promotion - supposedly by those same talk-show hosts in authority over their own particular broadcast shows and detailed content therein.

Old-Testament Solomon would remind us that "in the abundance of counselors there is safety," and frequently two heads are better than one, because others see things that certain others do not see, and thus thankfully compensate for what is lacking.

Some issues are adiaphoric, in that it really does not matter what people decide about whatever, or their unique and differing preferences and selections. One choice is just as "good" (or maybe instead: as effective and pleasing and beneficial) as the other (as frequently is the case in selecting different brands and colors and shapes of consumables and usables for common, everyday, routine activities).

Pertaining to other things, there is [only] one best way to do things correctly (as is the case of generally driving on the right side of the road, per Ecclesiastes 10:2), and sometimes only one specific way to do it at all (see John 14:6). An example of the latter would be the exact upper-and-lower-case alphanumeric BIOS passcode required to get into a desktop or laptop computer.

The broad scope of social issues is generally related to both science and religion, and discussion thereof usually involves eventual recourse to either one or both of them. As you the reader are aware, there are many specializations of science designated with a descriptive ....ology identification (e.g. microbiology, anthropology, archeology, opthalmology, and theology, etc.). The last science mentioned is frequently the ultimate and final-word science to allude to and evaluate by.

Along those lines, the Founding Fathers of the United States constructed the First Amendment of the Constitution not only mentioning religion but setting parameters both regarding and concerning the public and governmental expression of such, specifically: "Congress shall make no law respecting establishment of religion, nor prohibiting the free exercise thereof."

A Christian interpretation of that, which at least privately would most likely have been acknowledged and agreed with by those same Founding Fathers, would read something like: "No branch of federal, state, county, city, or township government (especially public schools) shall establish anti-Christian religion, nor prohibit the free exercise of genuine KJV/RSV (Holy Bible)-congruent Christian religion." Clearly, such a pro-Christian interpretation would exclude a too-short-of-a-Bible Judaism plus too-long-of-an-apocrypha-included-Bible Catholicism, Joseph-Smith-writing-included-Bible Mormonism, and no-Old-Testament-nor-New-Testament Hinduism, Buddhism, and Islam.

With that in mind, justification is obviously present for inclusion of the words "under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance, the motto In God We Trust on federal coinage, the posting and planting of The Ten Commandments on government property, the non-suppressed placement and use of Gideon-type Bibles within the libraries and classrooms of public schools and public motels and public corporations, and the display of the Christian Flag in American courtrooms.

Repression against the previously-mentioned religious expression along with quench-the-Spirit prohibition against liberty and freedom to think and behave in accord with such is obviously neither allowable by the founding documents of this nation nor especially by the requisites contained within Scripture.

However, in the application of various aspects of social-issues doctrines, opposing views pertaining to Fairness-Doctrine-compliant enactment for or against specific persons is certainly within the realm of legitimacy.

For example, to allow the suicidal to commit self-murderous suicide against themselves (wilfully contrary to all advisory persuasion) should be an option for those so driven, and - in one sense - nothing can be done about it to stop them from so doing anyway. The belligerantly arrogant and perverse craving of homosexuals to inflict themselves with AIDS as a consequence of queer same-gender misbehavior should not be stymied for those diehards relentlessly set upon so destroying themselves, much to the disappointment and displeasure of those interdependently around them. The obsession of a woman to mangle her body by abortion-homicide should not be denied for those who see no problem with sterilizing themselves and insuring medical complications against "their own" bodies God created and sustains and owns, not to mention the murderous death against an innocent child in the womb, or presume such is merely a surgical-tissue fetus and not "child" (the human personhood of whom is plainly apparent according to the identical Greek-Text word brephos for babe of both pre-born John mentioned in Luke 1:41 and already-born Jesus in Luke 2:16). To allow people to poison and electrocute themselves should be allowed for the stubbornly and stupidly insane, being that that is their relentless mindset to so burden other people around them. Misconvincing themselves into the silly and anti-Biblical mythology of evolution is a possibility for those dead set on making pseudo-educated and deliberately-ignorant non-intellectual fools of themselves and those they mis-educate with such deviant millions-and-billions-of-years life-kinds-transitioned brainwashing and propaganda.

There has to be The (not merely: "an") Absolute Standard which is regarded as The Common Denominator to umpire between not only the suggestions of differing and opposing views on issues, but also the evaluation and implementation (or absence of implementation) pertaining to such. There is ONLY ONE known standard like that in existence which humans have become aware of, and the interpretative ramifications of such follow concordantly:

Contemplate the following fairly-representative paraphrases of GOD's Holy Word and Will as portrayed in the paraphrased Scripture verses below of The HOLY BIBLE:

Leviticus 27:1-7 = A female human is worth less than a male human. (paraphrased)
Numbers 5:31 = The man shall be free from iniquity, but the woman shall bear her iniquity.
Numbers 30:13 = Any vow and any binding oath a wife makes to afflict herself, her husband may establish, or her husband may make void.
Ecclesiastes 7:27-28 = One good [male politician and news reporter] I have found, but a woman [politician and news reporter] among all these I have not found. (paraphrased)
Isaiah 3:12 = My [besieged] people are [harassed] by [nondisciplined oppressive bratty] children and ruled by [feminist-sexist] women [mispretending they can think, perform, and compete like men]. (paraphrased)
Nahum 3:13 = You do NOT want a combat platoon of men in action disrupted, confused, and diverted by a moody, illogical, whimpering or sullen, sexually-erotic, bathroom-delayed, variety-demanding, non-compliant woman. (paraphrased)
Matthew 15:22-26 = And hey, a Canaanite woman from that region came out and cried, "Have mercy on me, Lord, Son of David; my daughter is severely possessed by a demon." But He did not answer the [women's-"rights" dog] a word. And his disciples came and begged him, saying, "Send her away, for she is [sexually] harassing us." (paraphrased)
Luke 11:27-28 = As He said this, a [typically-trouble-causing] woman-type in the crowd raised her [maryolatrous] voice and said to Him, "Blessed is the [Virgin Mary] womb [we pray to] that bore You, and the [Hail-Mary] breasts that You sucked!" But He said, "Blessed rather are those [no-prayer-to-Mary non-cultic-catholic saints] who (and not: "that") hear the word of God and keep it!" (paraphrased)
First Corinthians 11:1-16 = The head of a woman is the man, and the head of a man is Christ...It is not the custom of the churches of God to let a woman presume that LOOSE LONG hair shamefully exposed in public view is equivalent to a prayer shawl. (paraphrased)
First Corinthians 14:33-38 = As in all States of the Union, women are not allowed to speak but must remain in silence....What I am saying is not merely my opinion, but rather is a command of the Lord. (paraphrased)
First Timothy 2:12-14 = I allow NO woman to teach or have authority over men; she is to be silent. Adam was formed first, not [Hillary]. Adam was not deceived, but the [female Clintonite] - being deceived - became a transgressor. (paraphrased)
First Peter 3:7 = Husbands, live considerately with your wives, giving honor to the woman as the weaker vessel, that your prayers be not hindered.

According to the Fairness Doctrine, women in TV commercials or doing the news or weather or sports reports must be given equal time. That does NOT mean they have to be co-anchors or co-reporters simultaneously with men. Specifically, all-male newscasts, weathercasts, and sportscasts with all-male commercials can (and should) be apportioned to be broadcast at a certain dependably-occurring time slot each day....followed by an all-female equivalent of the same (for those sexist females who wait for that and for pansy males who also wait for that each day). Also, all-female programs can be placed in the wee hours of the morning after midnight, while men only are broadcast during suppertime and after-supper primetime time slots. But to mix male pop with female piss, and female poop with male pudding is simply not tolerable nor acceptable!

In summary, opposing views can be expounded upon by those in authority, but when that interferes with the safety, wellbeing, and sustenance of the sane and sensible who think and believe and act with Biblically-directed common sense, the opposing views and their consequences have to be limited to and against those deliberately and intentionally bent on afflicting their own selves with that.....and no one else.