Much consternation has been and continues to be expressed against pornography in print and on screen, whether in magazines, tabloids, newspapers, on TV, and over the internet.

At the same time, production and perusal of porn is a billion-dollar industry for sexually-hungry and erotically-aroused men seeking safe and controllable sensual satisfaction with regulatible images of compliant and voluntarily-denuded girls and women posing for such in their desire for sundry pseudo-benefits. Taking reclusive haven in covert pleasures of gazing at and lusting over totally-bared beauties is conveniently devoid of moody feminist-sexist insubordination, headache-declaring noncooperativeness, menstrual uncleanness, inflicted venereal disease, and financially-depletionary chance of surprise pregnancy accompanied by the embarrassingly prospect of reputational blackmail.

Not enough negativism has been nor is conveyed against the actual, live-person female humans lasciviously baring themselves of and for the licentuous-imagery porn.

We are all aware of gross forms of illegal indecently-exposed girls and women (infants excepted) ignorantly or deliberately baring or having bared breast(s), buttock(s) and/or crotch to the non-soliciting mixed-gender public. Now-and-then news reports of such lewd conduct in general public view sometimes contain references to consequential law-enforced punishment of arrest and fines against such daring, defiant, and lunatic flashers and streakers (though imprisonment is a rarity, and such antisocial public obnoxiousness is almost never eliminated by execution, except on occasion in Middle-Eastern islamic countries).

Even the wearing of thong and string bekinis during summertime on public beaches is sometimes prohibited by law in many places and locations throughout America (with the exception of within nudist and naturist parks, camps, and colonies).

However, less severe or flagrant types of lewd-conduct exhibitionism (under certain improper conditions and mandatory-styles circumstances) are sometimes frowned upon and criticized with derisive scorn...even during warm weather outdoors (as, for example, wearing way-too-short shorts, nipples-baring low-cut unbuttoned blouses, droopy or pushed-down slacks showing the upper crevice of the buttocks, etc.).

For ultra-fundamentalist Christians, though, even naked arms exposed by sleevesless blouses (see the fashion implications of RSV's and NASV's Second Samuel 13:18), nude legs exposed by shortened skirts or knee-length shorts (see the fashion inferences of RSV's and NASV's Isaiah 47:1-4), and/or baring parts of feet (such as toes and soles) exposed by sockslessness with or without sandals or flip-flops (see the prohibition commanded in RSV's and NASV's Jeremiah 2:25).....are intolerably obscene and repulsively-lurid immodesty!

Especially during cold winter months, worldly and pseudo-spiritual/falsely-"christian" gals (particularly toddlers, teens, and younger women as contrasted with elderly senior citizens) ignorantly, carelessly, selfishly, mindlessly, and/or deliberately sometimes "let their hair down" to silently and subtly flaunt as devilishly-demonic fake "angels" or rebelliously fling around longer-than-mouth-level LOOSE long hair not tied up in a chignon (pug or bun) nor tied in a single back-of-head ponytail....for whatever satanic-glamour doctrines-of-demons irrationalizing excuses). Preening the hair for whatever conscience-striken purpose with the hands into a temporary ponytail to then let it fall down loose again is no substitute for actually tying it with a binder into a back-of-head ponytail.

There are numerous pertinent Scripture verses to describe, condemn and counteract such abnormal and errant sexually-harassing indecency.....such as RSV's and NASV's Numbers 5:18 (relating loosening long hair with suspicion of adultery having been committed), RSV's and NASV's Song of Solomon 7:5 (indicating that such erotic mopheadedness is reserved exclusively for one's own spouse only when alone in private with him), and First Corinthians 11:14-16 (inferring that it is not the custom of the churches of God to regard loose long hair on a woman as equivalent or sufficient as a prayer-shawl covering nor veil).

Lamentably, the KJV-type Bible translations - which are generally more accurate (in accord with the inerrant Scrivener/Trinitarian Greek New-Testament Text) than many other modern "translations - are hideously deficient and lacking concerning correct wording congruent with the ben Asher Masoretic Hebrew Text of the Old Testament (edited by Rudolf Kittel with his Biblia Hebraica rendition) pertaining to such vital verses as Numbers 5:18, Second Samuel 13:18, and Song of Solomon 7:5.

Fortunately, comparison with the RSV and NASV reveals such deplorable heretical and non-insignificant discrepancies and corrrects them with true-wording semantics, thus enlightening honest and genuiine Christians as to the real will of God regarding what the Lord in fact considers mandatory modesty against the filthy-immentality, nitpickiness-habitualized, legalism-perpetuated, gutter-mind-obsessive defilement caused by shameful, needless, and senseless general-public-view female-human mopheadedness.