NO Evolution "Education"

The title could also have read: "No Evolution MIS-Education."

Be that as it is, I do have reason to not wish the worst for the typical public-school student, knowing that they are both inquisitive enough and intelligent enough to understand differing controversial viewpoints of and filtering out piss in their pop and poop in their pudding before ingesting such.

Mixed with the pop of newly-discovered already-adult-and-fully-formed fossilized artifacts now and then plus here and there is the piss of accompanying such enlightenment with (mis-)assertion of tens of thousands to hundreds of million years age claims. [Pardon me if I ruffled you with my shocktalk wording, but pertinent points MUST be made!]

The intellectually knowledgeable and honest need to remember that radioactive-isotope dating is not a reliable way to measure the age of antiquities such as fossils, being that (assuming radioactive decay rate has always been constant from the start) it is never known the initial amount of radioactive material nor whether or not more or less of similar radioactive isotope was added or subtracted because of whatever. To the consternation of random-assembly evolutionists (regardless of their illogical-by-inconsistency whimsically-changing-time-periods shenanigans), there has always been and continues to be an embarrassing absence of transitional fossils and thus corresponding species (or better yet: kinds). And to simply yet dogmatically presume a concocted age adamently maintained by authoritative arrogance simply is not scientifically justifiable. Whether it be Haeckel's embryonic misrepresentations or the deviately-imagined conniving-artist-assisted image fabrications of hoaxes involving bits of man-misconnected-with-animal bone fragments buried miles apart, one can debate whether to call the nonscientific prophets of evolutionary-mythology heresy anti-religiously superstitious or inaccurate pseudo-"scientists" with or without patsy academic degrees from associational pseudo-educators.

I recently saw a video by the Discovery Institute in which various Ph.D. educators explicitly detailed certain fatal flaws in Darwinian origins theory as they exposed the heavy-handed oppression and deplorably-asinine lunacy of some pro-evolution school principal in the state of Washington plus the somewhat-mopheaded female director of some so-called and perhaps taxpayer-funded national science advisory council or foundation. Though lightly brushing off the irreparably-severe defects of Darwinian dogma, one wonders whether Ms-mind-in-a-rut would deem an accidental decimation in her annual pork-barrel grant check "a minor glitch." Because of pro-evolutionists like her and Mr. Bullyboy Principal, serious study of empirical origins, microbiological, genetic, anthropological, and astronomical science has been replaced by an indiscriminate cheap-grace, kids-rule, pablum-permissive powerlessness - rife and reeking with everyone-is-OK-acceptivity, bestowing non-merited self-esteem on the non-deserving, but fanatical self-righteous-salvation activism of multiculturalism, inclusive with weird heresies, racism, and sexism .....while wrongfully and negativistically discriminating against and censoring the Bible....judgmentally and intolerantly defended with pietistic goody-goody-worded moralisms of questionable-philosophy axioms and maxims worse than the "Everything has a beginning" and "Everything has an end" blatterings printed within fortune cookies.

Lamentably, the brave and commendable Ph.D. investigators against evolution presumed an alleged "Cambrian Age" in which all sorts of lifeforms suddently appeared.

Young-earth Biblical creationists believing in a catastrophic worldwide flood at the time of Noah and his family easily relate the appearance of such myriad fossilized lifeforms in rock strata not to a million-of-years-old "Cambrian Age" but rather lifeforms suddenly and successfully being quickly buried and thus preserved by a cataclysmic flood completely covering all of Earth's surface occurring only a few thousands years ago.

Much of the irrationalizing excuses and difficulty caused by pro-evolution (mis-)educators bullying their bias against the will of Christian parents in opposition to anti-Bible immoral-majority parents of anti-Christian prejudice relates to them (mis-)constueing Genesis in the Holy Bible to be merely a "religious" Text.

It, of course, is true that there are references to God as Creator within Scripture, and humanity's relation and obligation to consequential right-and-wrong decision-making and behavior, but many Bible verses of enlightenment are of a purely scientific nature without referral to Divinity nor morality. For example, excluding references to the Creator, the first chapter of Genesis would read:

In the beginning, heavens and earth existed.
Earth was without form and void, and darkness was upon the face of the deep,
and there was the face of the waters.
There was light.
The light was separate from the darkness.
There was evening and there was morning, one day.
There was a firmament called heaven in the midst of the waters,
and separated the waters under the firmament from the waters above the firmament.
There was evening and there was morning, a second day.
The waters called seas gathered together into one place, and dry land called earth appeared.
And the same day the earth put forth vegetation such as plants yielding seed,
and fruit trees bearing fruit in which is their seed,
each according to its kind upon the earth.
There was evening and there was morning, a third day.

Now, even though absent above is allusion to God calling into being what was previously stated, the statements themselves are obviously historical. Whether one should call them "scientific" depends on how one defines "scientific" statements. Is 2 + 2 = 4 a "scientific" statement? It certainly is a symbolic abstraction. What about complex Latin names given to plant phyla? Is THAT "scientific?" Is the almost-incredibly-childish phrase "Big Bang" considered "scientific?" How about the mindless pseudo-"medical" mantra of "Keep Abortion Safe and Legal" (referring to the criminality of murdering babies and mangling mothers) in comparison with the Ethno-Cleansing of antisemitic nazis pouring out poison gas into shower stalls of concentration-camp jews? Statements of non-laboratory inventiveness might or might not be considered "scientific" even though they are clearly valid and acceptable. With that in mind, one should constantly admit that discovered principles and phenomena of nature did not originate by such being discovered but instead were already there to be discovered by some discoverer who was not their Creator. Encountering various elements and compounds of chemistry and mixing that with electicity and various types of electromagnetic radiation to produce our plethoria of modern marvels in no way created the basic substances already and obviously designed by some Designer and created by some Creator.

Moreover, our own beloved American-Constitution First Amendment contains a religious clause which - if all reference to religious is forbidden - would necessitate its very demise and non-use. But as it legally now is (and listen up PAW and ACLU and AUSUS!): although scientific references to religion are not to be established as ceremoniously and ritualistic church, synagogue, or mosque law....neither are they to be prohibited so as not to be freely expressed. Again, simply because that part of the ben Asher Hebrew-lettered text within which are the writings of Genesis (from whoever authored such and in what way(s), which some have called the Torah and others part of the Pentateuch and still others The Bible), contain references to "God" and "His" purported creational activities....does not invalidate the veracity of PUBLICLY-accessible and PUBLICLY-legitimate Scriptural history relating to open-minded scientific inquiry into origins and everything conceivable relating to that.

And which Bible should one use in non-bigoted and thorough scientific investigation and analysis?

Do you have a computer? With a Windows passcode? If your operating system is Windows 95 or Windows 98, I can simply click on "Cancel" to bypass any passcode you made up and proceed into the guts of your computer to do whatever I want. However, if you have a BIOS (CMOS) passcode, I must type in only that one very-specific-and-particular alpha-numeric upper-case/lower-case precisely-sequential arrangement of letters and/or numbers to get into your computer. ANYTHING ELSE simply will NOT work. ANYTHING else! There is ONLY ONE TRUE Holy Bible, and it is the scientific-history-containing Sacred-66 books of the Christian Bible as secondarily revealed in the best of the King James Version, Revised Standard Version, Wesley Version, etc. and primarily revealed in the inerrant ben Asher Hebrew Text of the Old Testament (notably edited by Kittel) and the inerrant Trinitarian Greek Text of the New Testament (synthesized by Scrivener in the tradition of the Antioch Church, reputable church fathers and Middle-Age monks, Erasmus, Luther, Elzevir, Beza, Stephanus, and finally Scrivener but NOT Westcott and Hort nor Nestle).