Summary of
public results of haplogroup R subclade SNP results
John McEwan
1st Oct 2005 Last updated 8th July 2007
Background
The R haplogroup comprises a large proportion of individuals in public
genealogical (STR based) databases. This website is largely devoted to an
analysis of the Ysearch STR database to identify clusters within R especially
R1b associated with historic and geographically based populations. Haplogroups
are defined by SNP mutations and are not commonly tested by the genotyping
companies. Within R1b there are a series of SNPs that divide this haplogroup,
but at the current time little is known about the fraction of R1b these
subclades define, nor what relationship they have with STR defined clusters.
Currently, the only major database storing general SNP genotype results
in a searchable form is DNA-Fingerprint.
Individuals also often release information on the Genealogy
DNA list-server or store it in Charles Kerchner’s Yahoo DNA-ANTHROGENEALOGY
database tables. For many following the list server discussions, these results
can be confusing and difficult to search. Similar comments apply to discussions
about the DYS385 Kittler test,
DYF399S1, and 464x
test available from FTDNA. The most
comprehensive R1b subclade SNP tests are available from Ethnoancestry although selected R1b
SNPs are available from other suppliers.
This page attempts to address the confusion by presenting posted SNP results
in a clear and consistent format in a single location. It will be updated until
such time as the public databases include a provision to: enter, store and
update in a searchable format individual SNP genotypes, include Ysearch IDs and
are widely utilized. Results posted to the genealogy listserver, or sent direct
to myself at mcewanj at xtra.co.nz
(replace the at with @) will be included in this list.
Please provide your Ysearch ID as well to ensure unambiguous identification.
However, you are strongly encouraged to also upload your data into one of the
databases storing SNP results.
Fig 1. Summary of the
interim R1b haplogroup tree, based on SNP results available to date. For older
trees see YCC
2002, Jobling
2003 , FTDNA 2005 , Athey 2005 R1b and YCC 2002 conversion
table from systems in use prior to 2002. The current official tree is at ISOGG 2007 (Last
updated 10th June 2007)
Results
Distribution of derived SNPs within 37 marker STR
haplotype clusters
Many people often want to
predict what haplogroup they are in from their STR markers. This can be done
for most people with high confidence to the major haplogroup categories, but
for most R1b subclades it cannot be done reliably. The table below summarizes
the results to date. It is expected that as the number of STR markers genotyped
increases more reliable haplogroup classification will be possible.
Table 1. Summary of Haplogroup classification by haplotype
STR cluster assignment, R1b1c* had to have been typed for the majority of the
subclade SNPs including S21 (Jul 2007)
|
Haplogroup |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STRcluster |
R1b1 |
R1b1b |
R1b1c* |
R1b1c4 |
R1b1c6 |
R1b1c7 |
R1b1c8 |
R1b1c9 |
R1b1c9a |
R1b1c9b |
R1b1c10 |
R1b1c11 |
R1b1c/464x+ |
R2 |
Grand
Total |
1 |
|
|
5 |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
10 |
2 |
|
|
6 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
8 |
3 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
13 |
4 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
5 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
6 |
|
|
1 |
|
2 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
5 |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
10 |
8 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
9 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
10 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
14 |
|
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
15 |
|
|
2 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
16 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
17 |
|
|
3 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
18 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
19 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130 |
20 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
21 |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
23 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
24 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
25 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
5 |
25.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
26 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
28 |
|
|
1 |
|
2 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
29 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
5 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
5 |
33 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
35 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
36 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
37 |
|
|
2 |
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
5 |
38 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
39 |
|
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
|
2 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
6 |
40 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4 |
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
42 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
43 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
5 |
44 |
|
|
3 |
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
6 |
45 |
|
|
3 |
|
1 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
8 |
46 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
47 |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
48 |
|
|
3 |
|
2 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
49 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
49.5 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
99 |
5 |
2 |
8 |
|
4 |
|
|
8 |
|
1 |
6 |
|
|
12 |
46 |
ND |
|
|
1 |
1 |
4 |
|
1 |
5 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
16 |
Grand
Total |
5 |
2 |
100 |
4 |
23 |
129 |
1 |
74 |
5 |
13 |
34 |
1 |
10 |
12 |
413 |
Many people who test
positive for a SNP want to know their likely origin, or alternatively based on
their origin should they test for a certain SNP. The table below attempts to
answer that question. However, be aware that sampling is biased especially for
R1b1c7 (should be 1-3% of R1b1c) and the true percentage of R1b1c* is
understated perhaps by twofold.
Table 2.
Summary of Haplogroup classification by percentage geographic location. R1b1c*
had to have been typed for the majority of the subclade SNPs including S21 (Jul
2007)
|
Haplogroup |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Origin |
R1b1 |
R1b1b |
R1b1c* |
R1b1c4 |
R1b1c6 |
R1b1c7 |
R1b1c8 |
R1b1c9 |
R1b1c9a |
R1b1c9b |
R1b1c10 |
R1b1c11 |
R1b1c/464x+ |
R2 |
num |
Asia |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
100 |
4 |
CentEur |
17 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
67 |
0 |
0 |
17 |
6 |
EastEur |
25 |
0 |
13 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
0 |
0 |
38 |
8 |
England |
0 |
0 |
26 |
0 |
11 |
5 |
0 |
24 |
5 |
12 |
15 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
66 |
Iberia |
0 |
0 |
0 |
33 |
67 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
Ireland |
0 |
0 |
17 |
0 |
3 |
70 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
0 |
100 |
NorthEur |
0 |
0 |
31 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
0 |
38 |
0 |
6 |
19 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
Scotland |
0 |
0 |
37 |
0 |
0 |
19 |
0 |
28 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
2 |
4 |
0 |
57 |
SouthEur |
0 |
22 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
22 |
0 |
0 |
44 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
9 |
unknown |
2 |
0 |
27 |
2 |
7 |
34 |
1 |
19 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
128 |
Wales |
0 |
0 |
33 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
67 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
WestEur |
0 |
0 |
30 |
10 |
20 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
percent/hap |
1 |
0 |
24 |
1 |
6 |
31 |
0 |
18 |
1 |
3 |
8 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
413 |