|
Scientific Proof of God confirms
Christian Science
Mary Baker Eddy wrote
Science and Health with Keys to the
Scriptures in 1870. In 1879 she obtained a
charter to found the Christian Science
Church. In the following 125 years
Christian Science attracted millions of members with churches
in nearly every city in America and in over 75 foreign
countries. The Mother Church in Boston is now a well
known religious landmark. The Christian Science church
also publishes the Pulitzer Prize winning newspaper, the
Christian Science Monitor. The following
discussion of Christian Science will dwell on only the
"scientific" aspects of Christian Science theology
inasmuch as it is intended to show that the principles of
Christian Science are identically coincident with the results
of the scientific proof of God discovered by George Hammond in
1997. Above all else, Mary Baker Eddy is
famous for stating that "God is mind". She is not the
first one to state this. Bishop Berkeley published a
similar theory as early as 1710. However, Mary Baker
Eddy is the only one in history who has ever successfully
founded a major religion upon this principle. It is that
historical fact that gives an undeniable respectability and
credence to the doctrine. The first thing
that anyone who has read the first 4 pages of my website will
realize, is that Hammond is saying the same thing, in fact,
Hammond has found a 2-decimal point scientific proof of
it. According to Hammond's discovery, "God" is the
effect on the human mind (particularly visual perception) of
the Brain Growth Deficit caused by the Secular Trend in human
growth. The growth deficit causes the "size and speed"
of the world to change. According to this, certainly the
statement "God is mind" is scientifically confirmed.
In fact, a closer reading of Mary Baker Eddy reveals an
even more detailed concordance with Hammond's discovery.
On page 174, lines 23-24 of Prose Works,
she says:
The kingdom of
heaven is the reign of
divine
Science: it is a mental state.
Here we have a
direct corroboration from the vast historical sweep of
Christian Science that "heaven is a mental state". And
that is exactly what Hammond's discovery proves.
Specifically, this "mental state" is proven to be a
"perceptual state", that is, it is the missing perception that
belongs to the ungrown part of the human brain, and which, is
"spiritually" cognizant to the individual. Using modern
Psychometry, the "size of heaven" can actually be
scientifically measured. In fact, an even
more elaborate reference to the "brain growth deficit", which
is caused by the human physical growth deficit itself, can be
found on page 97 of the same volume, lines
25-32:
To my sense, we have not
seen all of man;
he is more than
personal sense can cognize,
who is
the image and likeness of the infinite.
I have not seen a perfect man in mind or
body,-- and such must be the
personality
of him who is the
true likeness: the lost
image
is not this personality, and corporeal
man is this lost image; hence, it doth not
appear
what is the real personality
of man.
Here Mary Baker Eddy is referring to the full
grown man as the "perfect man" and the "true likeness" of
God. She refers to actual man (not fully grown) as the
"lost image" of God. She also observes that she has
never seen a "perfect man". All of this is in direct
accord with Hammond's demonstration that the Secular Trend
Growth Deficit is the biological explanation of God… vis a vis
the brain growth deficit which explains why "God is
mind". "God" is the perfect mind, that is, the mind of a
full grown human being, and such a person has never existed on
the face of the Earth according to the Secular Trend, Jesus of
Nazareth notwithstanding. Clearly, a reading
of Science and Health shows that every
facet and detail of Mary Baker Eddy's theology falls with
exact coincidence on the scientific explanation of God
discovered by Hammond. There is simply no question, that
both Hammond and Eddy are in complete agreement on the
scientific phenomenology of God. Christian Science is of
course more than a theory at this point, it is a vast
experimental, social and historic success. Hammond's
work on the other hand is purely a scientific theory, although
confirmed by experimental Psychometry data and axiomatic
Relativity theory. I am here to merely suggest, that the
utter convergence of these two vast and different historical
occurrences of the same result, constitutes an overwhelming
proof of the scientific discovery.
George Hammond
April, 2004
RETURN
TO HOME PAGE
RETURN
TO DIRECTORY
|
|