This piece is being written in January - the coldest month of the
year in Minnesota. It will consist of a written indictment against the
summertime immodest in particularly Minnesota and especially of Twin Cities
metro-area girls plus younger and other women.
You might wonder why I am going to express my opinions about this NOW,
being that the same women are temporarily bundled up in long-sleeved winter
coats and cowboy-type boots! [However, a substantial number of them still
either ignorantly or deliberately flaunt their overly-erotic non-chignoned
or non-ponytailed LOOSENED long hair (longer than mouth-level) to the general
heterosexual-oriented public (whether or not concurrently and partially
covered with stocking caps of all designs and colors) almost all of which
general public have not asked and do not ask to be so harassed and assaulted
with the indecent sight of such lurid and perverted immodesty (violating
reasonable and enlightened interpretations of RSV's and NASV's Numbers 5:18
plus Song of Solomon 7:5 and KJV's First Corinthians 11:14-16 in respective
associated contexts).
Well, I have a good memory, and slightly-overfed-and-thus-somewhat-
overweight elephants don't easily forget. And yes, I did vote for mostly
Republicans in the General Election of 2004 because of their Scripture-like
platform.
Speaking of George W Bush.....
Ever since our secretively-pre-planning Commander-in-Chief deciding one fine
day to shock all of us non-insiders by springing his
Saddam-get-outa-your-palace demand with swat-the-mosquito-with-a-
sledgehammer force to questionably dethrone President Hussein and his Baathist
government of Iraq, world and notably American media has been seriously
focused on the very-modestly-attired islamic-fundamentalist moslem women of
not only the Taliban weaker sex of Afghanistan but substantially the
less-veiled-but-still-long-robed-and-shawled inferior gender of Iraq who
themselves were and are somewhat capable of sporting anti-invader/crusader
machine guns and suicide bombs under their Persian summer fashions.
So the U.S.A.'s summertime bikini-clad at public beaches, imposing their lewd
looks of naked sleevesless arms, nude shorts-bared legs, and sockless
sandeled feet, took it upon themselves (commandeering their own patsy
bullyboy male soldiers-of-fortune) to terroristically inflict their
obscene brand of self-righteous vengeance-based persecution of their own
hypocritical licentuous and lascivous pollution, against the law-and-order
stability of the traitorous-radical-islamic-insurgents-suppressing
and so-called intolerably-cruel dictator's flock.
But - some object - what about antisemitic Saddam calling the Christian
Coalition and Moral Majority (along perhaps with Billy Graham) "the Great
Satan?" Strange, I myself never did hear Saddam specify authentic Christians
alone as such. Had he targeted the Antagonistic Criminal Lawyers Union,
Planned Parentlessness, feminist-sexist National Organization Against
Women, disgustintly-perverted Homohuman Rites fagoqueers, evolutionists,
abortionists, and their ilk.....well....I thought that jackbooted
restriction-against-free-speech tyranny died out in the mid-1940s over in
Europe, and with the Peristroika coming of Gorbachev and Putin.
Of course, there was the foreign oil Saddam was PERHAPS planning on
strong-arming OPEC to deprive us of. After all, the man did invade Kuwait
and humiliated Bush Senior. But THAT was cause enough for Bush Junior to
get on his own retaliatory high horse? God knows how much environment-
worshipping demoncrats prevented and prevent us from becoming non-dependant
upon the antisemitic arab-oil cartel. But don't get me wrong:
I'm all for the creation, mass assembly, tax credits, advertisement, and
deployment of civilian electric cars and trucks.....though I don't know if
the gas-pump-price-raising service stations will go for it.
Rather than even STARTING to mindlessly and subversively rant,
blather, and yak on like childishly-silly demented TRIPE-UNE editorialists,
let's cut to the chase:
For WHAT CAUSES do american gals mis-exhibit themselves (especially during
warm summer days) like whoring perverts with their despicable sleeveslessness,
slackslessness and sockslessness?
They claim that:
(1) it is hot out and that gives them the privilege and
constitutional right to not die of light-white-cotton/air-conditioned
heatstroke, get and show off tan, and thus immodestly shove their partial
nudity into the non-soliciting faces of hapless victims who are rather
incapable of avoiding it, and/or
(2) to advertise themselves for sex to the general public in the
hope that one? particular guy [and "screw" all others!] who they MIGHT
decide to like will....and let's put it Scripturally: "know" them, "lay with"
or (best yet, and most promising) "go into" them. And they never heard
of discreet online and other dating services???
"SCREW?" Ah, that gets us to the English-language word choices of
watered-down words for too-little-sex too-much-sex Bible readers by their
compromising-semantics too-little-sex too-much-sex Bible translators!>
Why do I get the impression that either the original Hebrew Old-Testament
and original Greek New-Testament words, allegedly inspired by God Himself
and His Spirit, were lamentably prudish and therefore absurdly deficient in
relaying to us perfectly acceptable and vital human-sexual-activites
information........or the warped and twisted immentality of guilty-conscience
fearful-of-whoever translators resulted in depraved locked lingo far too
vague and wimpish? If the latter is the case, why the inane and irresponsible
pablem linguistics?
C'mon now. To KNOW someone - to any person with a REASONABLE understanding
of dictionary definition - means to be ACQUAINTED with them. KNOW means
KNOW - and only that. Let's not give multiple meanings to the same word and
thus cause insidious divisive confusion. To merely LAY with a (clothed, and
maybe even unclothed) woman will not cause a baby to pop out of her. To "go
into" (her bedroom or even into her Hebrews 13:4 bed) simply will NOT cause
pregancy either. To cause a man's semenizing penis to contact her any part
of a woman's vagina FREQUENTLY WILL cause a child and not simply fetus to be
conceived and formed (as the words NONBORN BABE and ALREADY-BORN BABE are
given the EXACT SAME Greek word in Luke 1:41 and Luke 2:16).
The to-some-considered SLANG word and to other (weaker persons) considered
unspeakable nonmentionable vulgarity word "fuck" need not be villified by
ludicrously, ridiculously, and needlessly importing a inappropriate sense of
screwing someone (i.e. cheating them badly), but CAN be kept to an
exclusively COITAL connotation. Clearly, it should indeed, rather than
being misused as a demeaning expletive. Moreover, the cutesy words and
phrases "have sex with, make whoopie, score, get it on, hit on, make love
to" and other moronic equivalents don't cut it.
WHAT words, then, should REALLY be used in the Bible when alluding to
X-to-XXX-rated-type human copulation non-erotically described in the Sacred
Text?
Well, some combination of Greek and Latin prefixes and
suffixes are possible, but I certainly would not want to blatter STUPID
buzzwords like "homophobic" (although the term 'phobohomic' does have a
certain understandable ring to it, descriptive of the phenomena of wisely
refraining from nosing around in the filthy feces of homogay fools).