Find out who REALLY is to blame!

The Roman emperor Nero didn’t mind Romans calling themselves Christians.  He didn’t throw them to the lions or burn them at the stake because they believed in Jesus.  He just wanted them to worship Caesar too.  They were allowed to add Jesus to their list of Roman gods.  Even today in Communist China, Christians are not beaten, tortured, and imprisoned in labor camps because they believe in Jesus or profess to be Christians.  Not at all.  They’re persecuted because they act like Christians.  They’re beaten and thrown in prison because they evangelize, because they deny the heresies of the government-sanctioned church, because they speak against tyrannical government usurpations such as the denial of God-given rights, because they refuse to render unto Caesar that which is due only to God.

Not every person who professes to be a Christian is one.  Faith without works, without tangible deeds of obedience, is dead faith: it is the faith of devils. (James 2:10-24)  Jesus asks, "Why do you call me Lord, Lord, and do not the things which I say?" (Luke 6:46)  "Ye shall know them by their fruits.  Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit.  A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.  Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down and cast into the fire.  Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them." (Matthew 7:16-20)

The President professes to be a Christian, goes to church, makes references to Bible verses, and says, "God bless America," but so did Bill Clinton, so this alone cannot be sufficient to win our vote.  Like Clinton, the President's fruit was evident to all with eyes to see during his campaign against Gore.  Many Christians were undoubtedly innocently ignorant of the President's liberal tendencies and so easily susceptible to his conservative rhetoric, but far too many were willfully blind to his bad fruit.

Why blame Bush for what the ACLU, PAW, AUSCS, Homogays, NOW, Planned Parentlessness, and Congressional Demoncrats have done?

Find out who REALLY is to blame!

Pragmatism took precedence over God’s Word and the principles of conservatism when conservatives the nation over supported and voted for the most electable candidate over the only blessable, anointable candidate, and as you will see in the course of this article, the roots of tyranny have deepened in America as a result.  The guilt for the daily encroachment on God-given rights to life, liberty, and property, under the President's leadership, can be laid squarely at the foot of the professing church.  If there was ever any doubt about the liberal sway of the President before his Presidency, that doubt should be well cleared up by now for all but only the willfully naïve.

Why blame Bush for what the ACLU, PAW, AUSCS, Homogays, NOW, Planned Parentlessness, and Congressional Demoncrats have done?

Find out who REALLY is to blame!

Do I believe that sincere, well-meaning Christians can vote for George Bush and be right with God?  Sure!  I believe that a sincere, well-meaning Christian can vote for the the Chief Executive and be right with God!  Having an IQ greater than a slug is necessary in order to be a Christian.  Unintended ignorance can destroy a nation, however, and God’s people must be vigilant to not be destroyed for a lack of knowledge. (Hosea 6:4)  It is intentional, willful, or malicious ignorance in the absence of the fear of God that brings culpability (Proverbs 9), and of this I fear many are guilty in their endorsement of the President in spite of the abundance of evidence of his bad fruit.
What is this "evil fruit" to which I refer?  Precisely what is it about Presidential opponents that I believe should preclude sincere Christians from voting for them?

Why blame Bush for what the ACLU, PAW, AUSCS, Homogays, NOW, Planned Parentlessness, and Congressional Demoncrats have done?

Find out who REALLY is to blame!

I. The President on Abortion

On the campaign trail, the President professed to be "pro-life", but with exceptions, he believes abortion to be justified in cases of rape and incest.[1],[2]  The New York Times reported, "It was the same tempered language that the President typically uses to discuss abortion, which he opposes except in cases of rape, incest or risk to a pregnant woman's life." [3]  As Alan Keyes pointed out in the Presidential debates and in various speeches, such pro-life exceptions that allow the innocent to be killed in some circumstances disqualify the President from being pro-life at all.[4]  If the President would justify the killing of one innocent person under his jurisdiction, he is disqualified from being a good person, much less a good leader.  Having a rapist for a dad is not a capital crime, and for the Supreme Court to state that innocent children can justly be killed because of the tragic circumstances of their conception reveals that he doesn’t comprehend the basic principle of the inalienable, inviolable, God-given right to life acknowledged in our nation’s founding documents.

Why blame Bush for what the ACLU, PAW, AUSCS, Homogays, NOW, Planned Parentlessness, and Congressional Demoncrats have done?

Find out who REALLY is to blame!

Also, on the campaign trail, the President and his wife both admitted that they don’t think Roe v. Wade should be overturned: "I don’t think the culture has changed to the extent that the American people or the Congress would totally ban abortions," The President professed.[5]  His wife reiterated her husband’s sentiments on a prime-time television interview on January 18, 2001.  The Commander-in-Chief has the power as the President of the United States to overturn this legal child-killing[6], but refuses to exercise this power, and so is responsible for all the child-killing he is allowing.

During the Presidential debates, the President was asked what he would say to a raped and pregnant family member.  He said that he would tell her that the decision whether or not to kill the child was up to her.  That is not pro-life.  That’s classic pro-abortion rhetoric.  If his daughter wanted to kill her grandmother to get the inheritance early, would he counsel her: "Sweetie, if you want to kill my mom, that’s completely up to you!"?  Commenting on abortion on the campaign trail, the President stated, "good people can disagree on that issue."[7]  Oh really?  This is manifestly absurd.  Can good people disagree on whether or not innocent people should be murdered?  I beg to differ: Good people cannot accept the murder of one single innocent human being.

Many conservatives have tried to overlook the President's liberal tendencies in hopes that at the least the Chief Executive will appoint a pro-lifer to the Supreme Court, and in so doing, help overturn Roe v. Wade.  Their hope might be without evidence, plainly contrary to evidence.  In his prime-time television debates with Gore, the President flatly denied that he had a pro-life litmus test for Court appointees.[8]  If a judicial candidate deemed it just and constitutional to execute innocent people, that did not exclude him from a possible appointment to the Supreme Court according to the President.  The President has insisted that he will only appoint "strict constructionists" to the Court, or people who will interpret and apply the Constitution as the founders intended and not as an evolving, "living document", but according to the President they need not be pro-life ‘strict constructionists.’  Does his record show that he does indeed appoint pro-abortion judges? Should we not be surprised if the President were to appoint anti-abortion judges to the Supreme Court?

Why blame Bush for what the ACLU, PAW, AUSCS, Homogays, NOW, Planned Parentlessness, and Congressional Demoncrats have done?

Find out who REALLY is to blame!

Frequently displayed as evidence of the President's pro-life views is his signing of legislation when he was Texas’ Governor that forbade underage girls from getting abortions without parental consent.  The pro-life community roared their approval: a 13-year-old girl can’t get an aspirin without parental consent, why should she be allowed to undergo a surgical or chemical abortion without parental consent?!  That’s sound pro-life legislation, right?  The President must be pro-life, huh?  Wrong!  Did you realize that this piece of legislation was nullified by a Supreme Court decision that ruled 6-3 that an unexceptional 17-year-old could get an abortion without telling her parents?

The New York Times reported, "It was, after all, appointees of the Governor who took the lead on the issue"  You see, it was the President who appointed or approved of four of the court’s nine justices and has been a political patron for a fifth, Harriet O’Neill, who wrote the majority opinion in the parental notification case.  If this is what the Governor means by "strict constructionists," then any hope that he will appoint an anti-execution pro-lifer to the Federal bench is baseless.

Also displayed as evidence that the President is pro-life was his reinstitution of the Mexico City policy in the first days of his Presidency, which forbade taxpayer dollars from being given to organizations that commit abortions overseas.[1]  However, the pro-life façade soon came down.  In a major policy shift, the President has decided to allow social service agencies in Africa and the Caribbean to receive funds from the U.S. treasury under his $15 billion emergency AIDS relief plan even if they promote family planning and provide abortions.[2],[3]  The New York Times confirmed, "Ignoring objections from his conservative base, the President is to make a Rose Garden speech on Tuesday in support of a $15 billion bill to fight A.I.D.S. internationally that will direct some money to groups that promote abortion," and that will do very little to actually prevent AIDS.[4]

Why blame Bush for what the ACLU, PAW, AUSCS, Homogays, NOW, Planned Parentlessness, and Congressional Demoncrats have done?

Find out who REALLY is to blame!

Conservative groups also hold forth the President's support of the "Partial Birth Abortion Ban" as evidence that he is indeed pro-life.  Really?  Does that make Tom Daschle pro-life, since he supports the Ban too?  Don’t be so gullible, friend.  Furthermore, the very language of the ban encourages the killing of the baby before extraction.  Thanks to democrat subversion, companies such as Planned Parenthood, the largest baby-killing conglomerate in the world, will get taxpayer funding.  Planned Parenthood was responsible for the deaths of 227,375 Americans last year alone.  Planned Parenthood's 2002-2003 Annual Report shows that 33 % of its income came from federal government grants and contracts totaling $254.4 million in the fiscal year ending in June 2003, thanks to Medicaid disbursements and the Congressional Title X of the Public Health Service Act in 2001.  Under Congress, this baby-killing organization has received more tax-funds than under Clinton!  Thanks in large part due to government handouts under democrats in Congress, Planned Parenthood raked in a hefty $36.6 million profit in its last fiscal year.[7]

It is no exaggeration to say that diabolical democrats kill babies.  They use influence and power to perpetuate the Abortion Holocaust.  Abortion abolitionists need to look beyond the Constitution Party to find friends for the preborn.  Those of us who supported George W. Bush and elected him to office are not responsible for the bloodshed perpetuated, either by way of duressed suppression or intentional refusal to judge irreligious judgment in misjudging who is really to blame by their observable fruit.

Why blame Bush for what the ACLU, PAW, AUSCS, Homogays, NOW, Planned Parentlessness, and Congressional Demoncrats have done?

Find out who REALLY is to blame!

II. George W. Bush on Sodomy

Conservatives all over the nation are significantly frightened right now about the prospects of Federally mandated "gay marriages".  The Massachusetts Supreme Court ruled this summer that their state constitution does not forbid gays from getting married, and they gave the legislature six months to change the marriage laws to accommodate sodomites who want to marry.  If the legislature capitulates and grants homosexuals the right to marry, they will get married in Massachusetts and return to their home states to sue to have their marriages accepted.  Thanks to a popular interpretation of the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the Constitution, those suits may be successful and if they are, the social and financial benefits states grant to marriage will be minimized and the covenant of marriage in America will be crippled.  Under the present judicial tyranny that regularly defies the will of the people and spurns the Constitution, the fear of family advocacy groups is legitimate.

Similarly, conservatives fear the judicial activism that is forcing a new religion down our throats, namely, atheistic humanism.  We have Federal judges like U.S. District Judge Myron Thompson ruling that Alabama Chief Justice Roy Moore has no right to acknowledge God on the job.  Conservatives are in an uproar about the judicial tyranny that would cause a democratically-elected, upright man such as Roy Moore, who was only following his state Constitution’s precedent in acknowledging God, to be evicted from the state bench.

Where do these bench-legislating, cultural-marxist judges come from?

They come from being rubber-stamped to the bench by some so-called conservative Republicans in the Senate.  Let’s judge Congress by their fruit.

In an interview with Diane Sawyer on gay unions, the CEO said, "The position of this administration is that whatever legal arrangements people want to make, they’re allowed to make, so long as it’s embraced by the state or at the state level."[8]  In other words, if state Supreme Court judges want "civil unions" like the Vermont statute, that state should be allowed to have it.[9]  We should not be surprised by the judicial tyranny that threatens to force gay marriages, "gay civil unions," and a new state religion, atheistic humanism, upon us. We have supported and voted for persons who appointed these pro-abortion, pro-homosexual judicial activists.  The same family advocacy groups that condemn statements of judges like this that undermine traditional marriage supported themin 2000 and will probably support them in 2004.[10] 

Certain judiary have stated that they has no qualms about hiring homosexuals,[11] and have proven it.  They have appointed open homosexuals to high government positions at a rate that almost makes Bill Clinton look like a homophobe![12]  In December of 1999, when the President was Governor, he appointed a supporter of the Gay and Lesbian Political Caucus and also of Planned Parenthood, Martha Hill Jamison, to the 164th District Court.  Very early in his tenure as President, the CEO appointed a pro-homosexual, pro-abortion candidate to the Federal bench.[13]    Early in 2000, the President attempted to purge the Republican platform of planks against homosexual marriage and homosexuals in the military.  On April 9, 2001, he appointed a renown homosexual activist Scott Evertz to the Office of National AIDS Policy, which was the first appointment of an open homosexual to this federal position.[14]  On June 18, 2002, he transferred Evertz to direct U.S. Policy on Global Fund for AIDS and appointed another homosexual activist to take over as new director of the Office of National AIDS Policy.[15]

Why blame Bush for what the ACLU, PAW, AUSCS, Homogays, NOW, Planned Parentlessness, and Congressional Demoncrats have done?

Find out who REALLY is to blame!

On September 18, 2001, Congress allowed a homosexual activist to be Ambassador to Romania at the protest of the Romanian government.  Furthermore, certain democrats permitted a Clinton policy that allows an "unmarried partner" of a foreign aid worker to be given the same status as a married spouse.  So the ambassador’s homosexual lover accompanies him to official government functions, travels with and resides with him on the taxpayers’ tab.  On August 22, 2001, the President appointed an open homosexual to the U.S. Commission on Fine Arts.[16]  He presided over the appointment of another open homosexual to oversee the choice of civilian personnel at the Pentagon.[17]  The administration posted a job for a "gay and lesbian program specialist" at the Department of Agriculture.  On November 1, 2001, Congress approved an open homosexual to the State Department as an arms control advisor, which was the first appointment of an openly gay person to a senior arms control post.  Divisive democrats insisted that openly homosexual Congressman Jim Kolbe of Arizona be given a prominent speaking role at the Republican National Convention.[18],[19]  On January 25, 2002, someone appointed openly gay Republicans to the President’s Advisory Council on HIV/AIDS.[20]

Even Bush reluctantly allowed running mate Dick Cheney’s openly gay daughter to be a consultant for him during his campaign.  The governor believes Mr. Cheney has a family, a Bush spokesman said, though being gay or lesbian is a liability in this campaign.  The governor endures both of Mr. Cheney’s daughters but will not disallow them to campaign with him.[1]  Dick Cheney inwardly frowns upon same-sex unions.[2]

On Dec. 21, 2001, Congress passed historic legislation extending family health benefits to Washington, D.C., employee's "partners" and also gave unfettered adoption rights to D.C. homosexual couples.  They refused to nullify a 1998 Clinton executive order prohibiting discrimination against sodomites in the federal workforce, and approved a bill allowing death benefits to be paid to the domestic partners of firefighters and police officers who die in the line of duty.[3]  This was the first time that a federal death benefit was granted to same-sex couples.  Also increased was funding for homosexual propaganda campaigns under the guise of health education programs, allowing the Office of Personnel Management, the Department of Agriculture, the Department of Transportation, and the Department of Justice, to openly celebrate 'gay pride.'[4]  On April 18, 2002, at the annual meeting of the Log Cabin Republicans, the White House was contaminated by a first-ever policy briefing for gay Republicans, featuring senior administration advisors.[5]  On June 24, 2002was signed the Father Mychal Judge Act, in honor of the openly gay fire department chaplain who died at the World Trade Center on 9-11.  This act allows public safety officers killed in the line of duty to assign federal benefits to designated beneficiaries, including same-sex partners.[6]  It is the first such federal law which allows such benefits to be granted.

Why blame Bush for what the ACLU, PAW, AUSCS, Homogays, NOW, Planned Parentlessness, and Congressional Demoncrats have done?

Find out who REALLY is to blame!

Certain deviated have publicly praised the Metropolian Community Church of Los Angeles on occasion of its 35th anniversary, a church that performs 6,000 'gay marriages' annually.[7]  In a letter of congratulation, one pervert said, 'By encouraging the celebration of faith and sharing of God's love and boundless mercy, churches like yours put hope in people's hearts and a sense of purpose in their lives.  This milestone provides an opportunity to reflect on your years of service and to rejoice in God's faithfulness to your congregation.'

Why blame Bush for what the ACLU, PAW, AUSCS, Homogays, NOW, Planned Parentlessness, and Congressional Demoncrats have done?

Certain deviates joined a horde of homosexual activists in maligning and mischaracterizing a Christian man, Jerry Thacker, he had appointed to the Presidential Advisory Council on HIV/AIDS.  Mr. Thacker’s wife acquired the disease from a blood transfusion during delivery, and when she and her infant son succumbed to the disease, Jerry Thacker, now HIV positive, devoted himself to ministering the transforming love of God to those dying of AIDS.  He offered forgiveness and redemption to homosexuals through the grace of Jesus Christ and reparative counseling.  Presidential spokesman Ari Fleischer said of Thacker, "The views that he holds are far, far removed from what the president believes."[8]  Thacker withdrew from the appointment after President Bush and the sodomite smear machine began to denigrate and verbally assault him for his beliefs.

President Bush said he reads the Bible daily. When the Bible and a pseudo-scientific consensus are at odds, whom do you think that George Bush believes?

George W. Bush is a fair-minded conservative.  If judicial activists pervert the covenant of marriage to accommodate the sodomites, it will be because of politicians against George Bush who appoint them.  The majority of the Supreme Court justices who handed legalized child-killing down to us, who outlawed Bible reading and prayer in schools, and who refused to hear Roy Moore’s appeal were appointed by the heretic synagogue of Satan in America.  The blame for the assault on the traditional family and the preborn can be laid squarely at the Devil's feet because of negligence in preferring pragmatism over principle, political power over persecution, and religious pluralism against Christ.  Some of the Supreme Court has forsaken God.  Thousands of 'the least of these' are murdered every day in America because the majority of professing disbelievers voted for it or failed to vote against it.

Why blame Bush for what the ACLU, PAW, AUSCS, Homogays, NOW, Planned Parentlessness, and Congressional Demoncrats have done?

Why blame Bush for what the ACLU, PAW, AUSCS, Homogays, NOW, Planned Parentlessness,
and Congressional Demoncrats have done?

Find out who REALLY is to blame!

In George W. Bush, the church has elected a government leader after its own image.  Our government and society have descended headlong into the sewage of immorality because those against the Church have.  Sodomites and baby-killers fill our government offices because they pollute pews and choir lofts.  Lukewarm pseudo-'christians' have have never been the salt of the United States of America, and Jesus promised that they'll be cast out and trodden under the boot heels of wicked men.[3]  Judgment must first begin in the house of God.  Suffering and tyranny will be our lot if we persist in our lukewarmness.  There are many more September 11’s coming, America.  The II Chronicles 7:14 remedy for national forgiveness and healing includes that we 'turn from (our) wicked ways.'  If America doesn’t repent for tolerating sin and leaving our first love, then the Lord will remove their candlestick.[4]  However, if we repent of our tolerance of sin and judge ourselves, if we put impenitent sinners out of the church as I Corinthians 5 instructs, the Lord promises that we will not be judged.  If we pray in faith for godly leaders and act in accordance, then the Lord, who sets up and tears down kings, might restore the Republic.  The future of our nation and our liberties depends on our obedience to His law and will.

It’s time that Christians make the same vow: never again will we use our influence or our vote or a single red cent to encourage one drop of innocent bloodshed.  We will draw a line in the sand far enough to the right that no baby-killers, sodomites, or God-haters can win our allegiance.  Like Gideon’s Army, the Lord may dwindle us down to a zealous few before the victorious battle, but it will be a few out of whom God can get some glory.

As for me and my house, we will support and vote for a Presidential candidate that is pro-life without exceptions, who will not capitulate to the militant sodomites, and who will constrain themselves to the Constitution upon which our nation was founded.  We will vote for the glory of God, and leave the miracles to Him.