Last night in Lakeville I did more damage to the pro-homosexual movement during a Zionist-Christian conference that anyone has done in a while.

As the last public inquisitor during the Q & A session, the audience of three hundred or more heard me take the mike and request the speaker to respond about what he thought of patriarchal polygamy in the Old Testament, which [obvious and historical] polygamy was NEVER ONCE condemned by the Lord nor any of His prophets. [May the reader reminisce about simultaneously-multiple-women-possessing Abraham, Jacob, Elkanah, David, Solomon, et. al.]

We are not talking about some demonic families-disruptive ridiculousness, rife and reeking in some TV episode of 5th-Wheel Wife Swap where husbands allow foreign-wife intruders into their own homes to assert inflammatory and divisively-belligerant terrorism in which the natural-fathered kids have to bow to arrogant non-solicited pseudo-authority of some pretend-mom twit. Such superdorks referred to are never "Survivors" in life's scripted "Amazing Race."

I could have extended my conference question to include the speaker's take on why Christ in the Holy Spirit of His Father inspired Saint Paul to prohibit ONLY bishops and deacons against engaging in polygamy themselves....and not instead ALL Christian men - whether or not bishops or deacons (see First Timothy and Titus, in context).

The basis for my question came from repeated recitations of the buzzphrase: "Marriage consists of the union of one man and ONE woman."

How about immigrants - especially with children - with harems from Arab and African nations who enter and live within the United States? WHICH spouse(s) should we demand the man to divorce? Is it really any of our business? Who has the "divine right" to tear asunder what GOD has joined together? Alluding to the aberrations of incest and non-consentual coercive abuse is non-applicable pertaining to permissible polygamy. Nor is [understandably-illegal and wicked] multiple-husband bigamy being discussed here. But not even a [wacko-activist] federal or other judge has the perogative to oppose such expensive and time-consuming multiple-wives constitutional privilege!

Personally, I do not and will never support the 'one-man-one-woman' buzzphrase, the reason being: it clearly is a non-Scriptural anti-Biblical disallowment of the legitimate possibility of one husband living in legally-declared or (safer yet:) non-State-registered common-law multiple-wife or multiple-concubine polygamy.

At this point, I am obligated to remind the Christian reader of the sacred-66 canonical Holy Bible that multiple wives and multiple concubines have absolutely NOTHING to do with fornication nor adultery nor unfaithful infidelity nor harlotry. Anyone who equates a secondary wife or concubine with a prostitute or whore rightly deserves to have their head non-allegorically and skillfully removed from the remainder of their wretched body by the radical-extremist fundamentalist of not Mo-HUM-med's nor All-LAH's but rather the LORD's choosing!

Non-promiscuous polygamy has lots to do with putting women in their subordinate-to-men place as the weaker-sex inferior gender who (in accord with God-through-Paul's inference in I Timothy 2:8-15) succomb to temptation first instead of men, and thus are usually the ones to blame who always start problems in the first place with their illogical, 'do-things-differently-for-a-change,' asinine pseudo-"creativity." The potential for polygamy helps push women off their chauvenistic feminist-sexist high horse, as disobedient insubordinate former-queen Vashti got ousted from her throne by the righteously-enraged Ahasuerus of Persia. For the demented and despicably dull of mind, let the reader be reminded that neither I nor my Creator consider neither women nor slaves to be subhuman. Moreover, I would rather be a woman if I had to.......than a rights-deprived slave. Then again, I would rather be a flying bird than a slimy snail.

Homosexual perverts everywhere are delighted that the 'one man ONE woman' buzzphrase has been blattered over and over by the feminists, their male-wimp patsies, and forced-feeding-tube religious fanatics. That buzzphrase carries with it a legalistically-shrill unintelligently-restrictive anti-polygamy connotation that lethally cripples any serious attack against original-Greek-Texted-First-Corinthians-6:9-condemned never-inherit-the-kingdom-of-heaven disgusting same-gender sodomy and homoeffeminate nauseum-gayness.