Among us open-minded scientists who are curious about and investigate everything around us there obviously is and which (so far) we have become aware of and perceive in our environment of nature....and particularly those of us scientists who are not absurdly and illogically biased, bigoted, and prejudiced against that entity and phenomena known as the Christian religion....there exists what many call (and which I personally believe to be) the historical Biblical record of TOTAL nudity of both 'Adam' and 'Eve' in 'the Garden of Eden' as referenced in the Old-Testament book of Genesis (chapters 1-3).

According to that account, both the adult male human and his adult female human were both completely nude to start with, but then (according to the record) disobeyed their Creator God by ingesting some forbidden fruit of some tree and thus not only for the first time became aware that they were totally naked but also similtaneously became ashamed against it.

One of course wonders what it would have been like had both Adam and Eve not sinned and thus continued on completely nude, especially to and with their offspring, the offspring of those offspring, and so forth - eventually becoming a tribe then nation then entire planet of totally-naked human creatures. Perhaps under those conditions, nudity-based eroticism might either would have been or not have been a factor in causing couples to procreate, and maybe others-directed adultery would have been absent and missing to God-obedient humans directed only by the Spirit of the Lord. Each married couple, in that case, would have "only had eyes for each other, and no one else?"

We read on that God Himself clothed the disobedient couple with much more than mere genitals-covering fig leaves. And as we continue to read through The HOLY BIBLE, we find that nudity continues to be covered, plus shame and marital eroticism [ Song of Solomon ] and harlotry [ Leviticus, Deuteronomy, Kings, Chronicles, Job, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Hosea, Nahum, First Timothy, etc. ] associated with public or private displays of human nudity. Even in the prophetic books of Scripture, including Revelation, the resurrected are portrayed as being completely clothed with long garments.

Apparently the shameless legitimately-public nudity that once was the norm can never be and will never come back. The damage done will never ever be undone. The proverbial cat is out of the bag, and the horse has escaped from the barn - permanently and forever.

We therefore have had, continue to have, and probably will continue to have anti-immodesty, anti-indecency, anti-public-nuisance, anti-sexual-harassment civil and sacred laws, statutes, and regulations against public displays of even partial nudity (and to specify THAT, ponder Numbers 5:18, Second Samuel 13:18 in the RSV or NASV, Proverbs 5:19, Song 7:5, Isaiah 3:17-18, Isaiah 20:1-4, Isaiah 47:1-4, Jeremiah 2:25, First Corinthians 11:1-16 in the KJV, First Timothy 2:8-9, etc.)

The nothing-new prevalence of nudist parks, nudist colonies, nude-sunbathing resorts and cruises and beaches, and more is a not-facing-reality FUTILE attempt by those of that mindframe to restore shameless heterosexual public nudity contrary to a Divinely etched-in-stone conviction and conscience against such.

The display of total or significantly-partial [ HEAD-and-HANDS- excepted ] nudity therefore must and should be restricted to SOLITARY episodes of birth, [private] urination and defecation, [private] bathing and showering, and (I hope that what I state next will not be overly-graphic nor lust-inciting to you the reader).....for eroticism-inspiring heterosexual activites along those lines within the private-couple sanctity of MARRIAGE and the confines of controlled-and-censored outside view.