You might wonder if anti-Christianity-in-public pseudo-"legal" covens and consortiums such as the Adversarial Criminal Liabilities Union (ACLU), Antagonists United for Severance of Church from State (AUSCS), Planned Parentlessness (a.k.a. Planned Promiscuity) can and will ever get on the same page with pro-Christianity-in-public lawyers and their Biblically-based legal entities such as Jay Sekulow with his American Center for Law ad Justice, Matt Staver with his Liberty Counsel, John Whitehead with his Rutherford Institute, and Alan Sears with his Alliance Defense Fund.

Did America's founding fathers REALLY desire that we ingest majority-of-fools non-prohibited/free-exercise (and thus First-Amendment-established) cultic/heretic-religion "piss" with minority-of-saints non-established-while-significantly-prohibited-and-not-freely-exercised authentic-Biblical-Christianity "pop," and so be - in various ways - forced by governmental sheriff and police to consume false-religion "poop" with genuine-Scripturally-Christian-religion "pudding"....when they wrote the non-establishment yet non-prohibition/free-exercise clauses of The First Amendment of The United States Constitution?

Should Second-Amendment-substitutionary/threatening police side in with feminist-sexist/chauvenist women who are disobedient and insubordinate against their own husbands with damnable demonic-doctrine irrationalizationary accusations of "battering" and "abuse" in light of such Scripture as:

Numbers 5:31 The man shall be free from iniquity, but the woman shall bear her iniquity."

Numbers 30:3 When a woman vows a vow to the LORD, and binds herself by a pledge, while within her father's house, in her youth,
4 and her father hears of her vow and of her pledge by which she has bound herself, and says nothing to her; then all her vows shall stand, and every pledge by which she has bound herself shall stand.
5 But if her father expresses disapproval to her on the day that he hears of it, no vow of hers, no pledge by which she has bound herself, shall stand; and the LORD will forgive her, because her father opposed her.
6 And if she is married to a husband, while under her vows or any thoughtless utterance of her lips by which she has bound herself,
7 and her husband hears of it, and says nothing to her on the day that he hears; then her vows shall stand, and her pledges by which she has bound herself shall stand.
8 But if, on the day that her husband comes to hear of it, he expresses disapproval, then he shall make void her vow which was on her, and the thoughtless utterance of her lips, by which she bound herself; and the LORD will forgive her.
9 But any vow of a widow or of a divorced woman, anything by which she has bound herself, shall stand against her.

Deuteronomy 22:5 "A woman shall not wear anything that pertains to a man, nor shall a man put on a woman's garment; for whoever does these things is an abomination to the LORD your God.

Proverbs 19:25 Strike a scoffer, and the simple will learn prudence; reprove [a man] of understanding, and [he] will gain knowledge.

Proverbs 29:19 By mere words a servant is not disciplined, for though [he] understands, [he] will not give heed.

Colossians 11:3 But I want you to understand that the head of every man is Christ, the head of a woman is her husband, and the head of Christ is God.

Ephesians 5:24 As the church is subject to Christ, so let wives also be subject in everything to their husbands.

Suppose the ACLU and AUSCS went to court to support fuzz who forced us to pray to the Virgin Mary, end prayers in the name of "allah," post "I Believe in Purgatory" bumper stickers on the backs of our vehicles, individually drink a whole quart of wine for daily or hourly eucharist, show the 3rd finger to an arresting officer, slap a motor-vehicle clerk in the face before paying license tabs, stick out the tongue for 15 full seconds to ladies over 90 years old, occasionally douse the next guy in the checkout line with complimentary coffee, inspect our roofs twice a day for any flies thereupon, and flush only one toilet no more than once a day?

How about Planned Promiscuity filing NAMBLA lawsuits against us for not monthly sodomizing a non-consentual toddler, not staring at the Sun for an hour each day, not jumping off the roof of the temple, not singing Christmas carols in public out of tune, and not completely denuding baby Jesus nor homopervert-effeminate mopheaded Jesus The Barefooted? in "artistic" depictions on government property?

True KJV/RSV-Bible religion would have us drive on the right side of the road on a two-lane highway per Old-Testament Solomon's directive: 'A wise man's heart inclines him to the right, but a fool's heart to the left.' All other religions (contrary and opposed to true KJV/RSV-Bible religion) would have us either non-predictably or capreciously drive on the left side of the road or always drive on the left side of the road into oncoming traffic.

For traffic safety, the driver of each vehicle on public roads temporarily owns the sovereign space their vehicle is traveling in at the moment. NO HUMAN has the right to invade that space of theirs to cause a collision (except for a compelling reason). Though only a state of momentary sovereignty, each driver has THE solitary sovereign right to that particular general-public-available passing space.

Civilized society is cursed and polluted with here-and-there-interspersed socialistic-immentality bureaucrats who replace individual humans with manipulatible statistics groupable together into ghetto-izable abstractions, with presumed one-size-fits-all removal of security-protecting privacy screens on public-library computer monitors (all in the sweet and variable-definitions name of anti-porn filtering while the sexually-harassing mopheaded/sleeveless/nude-legged/toes-exposed exhibitionists roam by)....and oil-does-not-mix-with-water pseudo-integration of sinners-with-saints freedom-of-movement-depriving light-rail-transit/mass-transit scheming which - if built - independent-destination travelers would generally not use (unless forced to), but instead turn such pork-barrel boondoggles into a despicable waste of taxpayer money.

Also consider the case of greedy and insensitive land-baron real-estate-"developers" like the realty tyrant blattering his own disruptive brand of imaginary need [for "additional senior-citizen housing in a small suburb for another one million people in the entire State by 2025 aged 55 and older"].....applying for tax-increment financing to an assistant city manager (which manager is concerned with relatively high acquisition costs ordered by the realty tyrant and his properties company) who relays that petition to the half-fool/half-sensible city council for tearing down already-existing houses to build even more "cooperative"-type condos and townhouses than the obvious overabundance of those already imposed here and there.

Senior citizens more or less involuntarily relocated into such would only own "a share of stock" of a [land-"development"] corporation enabling (but not "entitling") them to "occupy" a unit in [merely part of] the entire building but which structure is actually under the authority and land-title-ownership of the land-"development" company. Bought-into-it seniors would even have to pay debilitating monthly "association fees" to the land-"development"- company's elected board of land-"development"-company governors who could for various causes conveniently-for-themselves-but-not-for-adversely-affected-seniors oust disliked senior citizens whenever.

"Tax-increment financing" (TIF) is an anti-private-property-rights (communistic?) funding mechanism cities use to force (eminent-domain-style) real-estate takeover (questionably defined as "development") by paying for the cost of land acquisition, site preparation and facilities destruction and changing (questionably called "improvements"). Fortunately, the superior-gender city manager said that the "developer's" proposal would not come before the city council again until the realty "development" company "secures" purchase agreements from five affected private-property owners and appears before the city's housing and redevelopment authority.

One equally-greedy bonehead city council member who only sees dollar signs without sympathizing with the human suffering resulting from surprise-attack-relocation demand boasts himself: "a big fan of life-cycle housing," presumptuously claiming that: "the city doesn't have enough of it." The peaceful residential dwelling of seniors already living there to him only means that: "that corner is doing nothing."

In grateful contrast, another city council member has concerns about "displacing long-time elderly residents living on fixed income." Indeed!

Greedy and insensitive land-baron "developers" connive hand-in-glove with city inspectors to impose and enforce nitpicky mega-rules infractions for all sorts of miniscule house-maintenance imperfections. There are some god-forsaken heartless bureaucrats who must have a lot of time on their hands sitting on their trouble-causing butts in city hall making up trifling rules to bother particularly senior homeowners with.

The realty tyrant deceptively stated the lie that "there is a tremendous demand for this type of housing." [demand on HIS part against but not for the seniors he impoverishes with eminent-domain ouster relocation!]. He again deceptively went on to add: "The cooperative model hits the affordable component." ["affordable" to HIS already-filthy-rich-with- land-ownership pocketbook....but not to impoverished seniors he in effect causes to be inconveniently displaced!].

The properties tyrant then adds the excuse of "being close to the large grocery store" plus imposing already-overly-abundant ["developer"-controlled-and-"managed"] exercise, gardening, craft additions [which FEW seniors would ACTUALLY use under their own terms and conditions]. Realty tyrant then inserts his pro-environmental plug by stating that "we" "plan" to clean up the creekside and create a "public" outdoor "space" [and is he now conniving with the E.P.A?]

He presumes that the aging population of the suburban city "are not likely to leave" [HOW does HE know THAT for SURE?]. With pass-the-buck fabricated-virtual-entity diversion, the tyrant presumes that "the city's" "demographics" "suggest" that "many senior citizens would sell their homes to younger families if they had an opportunity to move into a ["development"-owned and strictly-enforced] "maintenence-free" environment" - being that "if THEY stay in THEIR homes longer than THEY SHOULD, or longer than THE CITY would LIKE, it reduces the ability for YOUNGER families to move in."

Ah, not only is the property tyrant's filthy-lucre greed exposed, but now also his actual hatred, despising, and contempt against peacefully-residing ELDERLY citizens who want to be left alone continuing to live without disturbance and harassment in their own homes on their own private property without threat of hostile takeover! His disgusting platitude violates such Scripture as:

Leviticus 19:32 You shall rise up before the hoary head, and honor the face of an old man, and you shall fear your God: I am the LORD.

1 Kings 12 & II Chronicles 10 Then King Rehoboam took counsel with the old men, who had stood before Solomon his father while he was yet alive, saying, "How do you advise me to answer this people?"
And they said to him, "If you will be a servant to this people today and serve them, and speak good words to them when you answer them, then they will be your servants for ever."
He then held counsel with the young men who had grown up with him and stood before him.
And he said to them, "What do you advise that we answer this people who have said to me, 'Lighten the yoke that your father put upon us'?"
And the young men who had grown up with him said to him, "Thus shall you speak to this people who said to you, 'Your father made our yoke heavy, but do you lighten it for us'; thus shall you say to them, 'My little finger is thicker than my father's loins.
And now, whereas my father laid upon you a heavy yoke, I will add to your yoke. My father chastised you with whips, but I will chastise you with scorpions.'"
So Jeroboam and all the people came to Rehoboam the third day, as the king said, "Come to me again the third day."
And the king answered the people harshly, and forsaking the counsel which the old men had given him,v he spoke to them according to the counsel of the young men, saying, "My father made your yoke heavy, but I will add to your yoke; my father chastised you with whips, but I will chastise you with scorpions."
So the angry and retaliatory suburban homeowners and renters left their homes, apartments, condos and townhouses all at once causing their previous dwellings to deteriorate into slum neighborhoods, punishing the city council by no longer sending in any more property tax money, and leaving the realty tyrant with no tenant income but instead a huge bill to pay off the condo and townhouse construction and utilities companies....as ghost-town-like crime and graffiti increased to the danger of surrounding suburbs, the county itself, the entire State, even imposing a virtual small-scale federal disaster area.

1 Timothy 5:17 Let the elders who rule well be considered worthy of double honor, especially those who labor in preaching and teaching;

1 Peter 5:5 Likewise you that are younger be subject to the elders. Clothe yourselves, all of you, with humility toward one another, for "God opposes the proud, but gives grace to the humble."

As you might begin to ascertain, most (if not all) of our good and beneficial civil governmental laws are non-chaotically non-randomly and non-evolutionarily based on The HOLY BIBLE, and thus are benign and accomodating to the general-public wellbeing of the innocent and sensible. Understandably so, because the Creator Himself has made all and everything in His creation benevolently accomodating for His created human creatures pertaining to their life-functions-facilitating physical environment (which they have defiled, corrupted, and polluted to their blame and shame and not His!).

Admittedly, the Creator did impose the stumbling blocks of the deadly Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil plus The Tempting Serpent into the otherwise-all-good Garden of Eden for whatever questionable purpose He did so. One wonders why He did not rather create fleshly nude robots always and only behaving correctly according to animal instinct, and thus prevent all the misery, suffering, disease, disability, and death resulting as a consequence of us curious and naiive humans inevitably choosing to utilize His created Tree and Serpent. In response to the obvious unfairness of that, we must keep in mind His compensatory provision of Son Jesus becoming our ticket to eternal Paradise where choice to sinfully screw up will forever be non-existent. Beats the crap out of being forever tormented with ever-consuming fire within the outer darkness in solitary confinement to the ages of the ages (despite the strange myths and lies psycho-deviants convince themselves to the contrary).

It is good that we all remember these things the next time we happen to see crosses on public tombstones, etched-in-stone replications of The Ten Commandments or In God We Trust on government property or no-serial-numbered government coins, accidently encounter or continue to listen to a public-school Christmas carol sung badly out of tune or similar in-public orchestral "performance" of the magnificent music of a symphonic mass or requiem, see a totally-naked baby Jesus in the cradled hay not modestly wrapped in swaddling clothes, see a swastika painted on a courthouse-lawn cross, or hear that some religious goof has made his flock lethally poisen themselves with koolaid.....all in the pseudo-sacred suicidal-bomber or whatever "Name of G-d" with or without the lustful presumption of naked young women in the hereafter.

All throughout the history of the entire Bible, church has never been separated from state, nor state from church. In the Old Testament, the major prophets and their Hebrew/Jewish associates prophesied about and dealt with the foreign nations of the Canaanites, Babylonians, Greeks, and Romans. Mention is even made of India and Spain, besides "kings of the east." Both Jesus Christ and Saint Paul were intimately involved with secular(?) Roman police, marshalls, soldiers, governors, and kings. Similarly today local police protect both Christian and non-Christian citizens and neighbors.....as Christian citizens and neighbors protect and cooperate with local police.

It is incorrect semantically to presume that there is isolated-quarantine "separation" of church "from" or "and" state, but it is correct to instead assume that there is distinction of church and state. "Render to Caesar what belongs to Caesar, and to God what belongs to God" - keeping in mind that God created and continues to maintain and direct Caesar according to HIS Divine natural laws, choice, will, power, and intelligent design.

Is there some "good" in EVERY non-harmful non-abusive religion? MUST we accept the bowing-down-to-the-ground fervency in repeated daily prayer and shawled/robed modesty of the islamic muslims....along with their concocted superstition of pseudo-divinity called "allah" and antisemitic satanic-verses Qu'ran (a.k.a. Koran)? MUST we accept the hypnotic and peaceful mantra droning of Buddhist, Tibetan, and Hindu monks along with their false heresies of reincarnation, excessive abstinence, excessive orgyism, cow-worship, and works-righteousness? MUST we accept the adament anti-NARAL anti-abortionism and anti-homosexuality of the catholic church along with their devilish doctrines of self-atonement by weekly eucharistic self-sacrifice, papal infallibility, bodily ascension of Mary, petitioning dead "saints," and adherence to the Apocrypha as part of canonical Scripture? Were the blessed crusader ministries of Jerry Falwell and D James Kennedy cursed with non-realistic belief that imposters in America would not go from bad to worse in these latter days?

From a Christian point of view, Congress and related legislators, judges, attorneys, politicians, media people, police, government-agency organizations and their bureacrats, plus public-school superintendents, principals, school-board members, teachers, and parents......need to remember the need for common-sense unity and cooperation relating to accomodating and consistent behavior of all in our independent yet interdependent town, city, county, state, federal, and global communities based on the constitutional interpretation of the First Amendment traditionally implying that no sectarian/denominational state religion nor especially cultic anti-Christian religion should be established....nor should the free exercise of genuine KJV/RSV-Bible Christian religion and those Christians who practice such be prohibited.