|
Questions to Lady Lost Part Twelve (Off the cuff answers):
1) You write a great deal, particularly in poems and other works not featured upon this site, about, "Alice." The alleged perpetrator (soon to be abbreviated Cyris style as the alleged perp) attempted to use these works for his deranged purposes. Can you explain a little more about these works true meaning? Well, most of what I ever wanted to reveal is already in the Trilogy Series. So I don't know what else I can say. I guess I can tell you Alice is not a multiple! LOL! Yes, the nut puppy insisted Alice was a multiple, isn't that a riot? LOL! I can also tell you the whole Alice situation was not in any way self-inflicted as that certain nut bunny also fixates over this incorrect conclusion in many areas. I suppose I could add that, initially, it was no one's fault and that no one could have prevented it entirely. For more, people are just going to have to purchase the Trilogy Series!
2) I believe I have asked you this before; however, I should ask once again for additional clarity purposes: What is your opinion of the alleged perp's interpretation of your many works? Yes, you've asked me that before and in length! I believe he's wackadoodle doo, mentally retarded, nearly illiterate, under-educated, delusional, unjustifiably egotistical, and totally fishing for meanings that never existed in any of my works. I believe his conclusions as beyond absurd. I think even he may know this last part to be true, but he can't admit it as he needed and still needs to rewrite my work's definitions, warp them to the maxim, to serve his demented purposes. If he had chosen to view my works realistically his supposed theory wouldn't have lasted for two seconds in his mind or in anyone else's mind. He's a stalker though and stalkers use whatever they can. They don't care whether it's reality or fabrication. And with the masses of non-poetry readers or extremely limited poetry readers being pretty ignorant about poetry and poetic expression I believe he figured using my poetry the way he has would be the perfect scam! Now, I believe he's figuring out that his scam isn't really working too well.
3) Speaking of his, scam as you so appropriately phrase it, he appears to be particularly fixated on a poem which used the wording, "Dropped Dangler," and he insisted this poem referred to your son's genitals. What do you think of this? The same as what I've said in answering question number two (2). It's another case of where if it weren't for all the helpless, hapless, voiceless and innocents combinations this could get to be entertaining, given no other more appealing choices within the system. He's sick! He's totally loony tunes! That poem, without having it in front of me and I know you're looking for it Gunther, was written about either an adult male or an adult female. I think he got on the same demented band wagon with many other works, like "Droopsy Whoopsies," too. Only a true pervert would take these phrases and change them to mean such sick things. I believe he's just such a pervert. Moreover, I think his fixation on these phrases of mine and his false interpretations is overwhelming evidence of where his head is at! Any non-perverted person would take the meanings in context! The context and the reality are related to the situation, which has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with any juvenile body part! In fact, the entire concept of juvenile bodies in general is so far out of the picture in my writings that it's unreal! Heck, he even gets into his garbage with, "A Needles End," and other works that have nothing to do with juveniles and a male could never experience any of the traumas depicted within these works! He went so far as to get into his nonsense with a work I wrote which contained some lines about the charley horses, horribly painful, that I get in my own person foot. He's just crazy!
_________________________
**A number of the works are found and presented below with valid limited comments from Lady Lost:
____________________________
"Dropped Dangler"
Dropped that dangler
Caught it again
Another yo-yo(s)---
Loopty Doopty act
Clutched it tightly
And stared at it
And stared at it
The hands didn't believe
What the eyes did see
That horrid putty
Seeping through fingers
All crimson and ruined
Dropped it again
And someone shouts ---
Oops droopsy whoopsy!
By Lady Lost
Copyright © 1999
All rights reserved
Library of Congress ©!
**Note from Lady Lost: What a reader could notice here is the use of the phrase Droopsie Whoopsie or Droopsy Whoopsy, both meaning the same thing. This is a phrase used repeatedly in many works of a related nature. The relation becomes clearer and clearer as the works are looked at in reasonable context.
___________________________
"Frailty"
A head snapped back
A skull went whack
Like a newborn
A smallest knick
And back it snaps
Low motor control
Atrophied muscles
Something too pathetic
A feeble-feeble neck
The head snapped back
Whatever happened
To cause such frailty.
By Lady Lost
Copyright © 1999
All rights reserved.
Library of Congress ©.
** Here is a slightly unrelated work, however also a work which the alleged perpetrator is fixated with. The lines, "LIKE a newborn," and "Atrophied muscles," "Whatever happened," "To cause such frailty," are the crux of this work.
1)"Like," indicates it is not an infant, but someone who feels as helpless as an infant.
2)"Atrophied muscles," indicate that the muscles are atrophied, the muscles were not always in this condition, there has been a change. Infants do not have atrophied muscles. This indicates that the person is an adult who has undergone a change which lead to atrophied muscles and weakness. This adult person, or older person -- old enough to have developed muscles that have been changed by some situation/circumstances, again feels very helpless.
4) "Whatever happened," again indicates a change from the norm. It does not indicate that this condition is the norm as it would be the norm with an infant. This is a person who was once physically different or a person who feels helpless due to perceived personal alterations from the norm once known.
4) "To cause such frailty," again states that this person feels their personal condition has been altered from the norm. One would not state something like, "What happened," "To cause such frailty," about an infant because infants are this way as the norm of development!
___________________________
"Body Beautiful"
The body beautiful
The body treasured
Worked and sleek
Worked and sleek
To that masterpiece
That artful wonder
A body beautiful
Then one night
Lapped into morn
Dipped in mourning
No more lovelies
No more pride
Just droopsy whoopsy
And this spread
Up further and further
A droopsy infection
From head to toe
Unzipped zippers
Unclasped claspers
That can't close-up
To body beautiful ---
Anymore.
By Lady Lost
Copyright © 1999
All rights reserved.
Library of Congress ©.
**Note from Lady Lost: Here we have another poem that uses the common phrase droopsy whoopsy in context with a body once beautiful concept. "Worked and sleek," "Worked and sleek," "To that masterpiece," "That artful wonder," "A body beautiful."
**These lines indicate again an alteration in a body which was worked and sleek, etc. This is obviously an adult body, which has undergone undesirable changes. It comes from the old concept of body beautiful in the work out era of aerobics and whatnot.
"No more pride," "Just droopsy whoopsy," "And this spread,""Up further and further," "A droopsy infection," "From head to toe," "Unzipped zippers," "Unclasped claspers," "That can't close-up," "To body beautiful --- Anymore."
**Here additional lines talk about adult alterations very clearly. These are a few examples of the context in which works must be taken. The term droopy whoopsy cannot mean one thing in one work and an entirely different thing in another work no more than a real English word can change meanings completely from one thing to an entirely other unrelated thing. The theme is very consistent in all of these works -- it reports a change in body and life for an adult person. It reports an unexpected alteration in the reality for an adult person. Unexpected would also indicate it was not self-planned or self-inflicted. The writer, in this case myself, is expressing shock and confusion about the situation and in this I am trying to explore what is happening, what has happened and process it out.
**It also states items that logically cannot happen to males of any age in any situation.
___________________________
"Weakness"
Why are they so clumsy?
Why am I so weak?
Used to be so strong
What takes 70 pounds
To knock me out
1000 pounds couldn't do
Way back when
Way back when
I used to be so strong.
By Lady Lost
Copyright © 1999
All rights reserved.
Library of Congress ©.
** Here is another example of personal adult feelings of alteration and helplessness. "Why am I so weak?"
"Used to be so strong," "What takes 70 pounds," "To knock me out," "1000 pounds couldn't do," "Way back when
Way back when," "I used to be so strong." Now one must ask what weighs 70 pounds that was in my life back then? Me thinks it was my doggies! Infants don't weigh 70 pounds! LOL Also dogs can be very clumsy! They really get all excited and run right into you and sometimes dogs do knock you down. Could this and other things, forces that are larger than you when you are a weak female also knock you down, causing your neck to snap back? I think so, I know so.
__________________________
"Hateful Reminders"
Joseph is available
Warming Ileena’s hunger
Seducing lost beauties
Lingering upon fringes
Begging for release
To swoon and swoon
Wandering into dreams
Dreams of lovers
Lovers of want’s tides
To have and to hold
To cradle beloved’s
That steadfast cherishing
Carried into places
Too sweet to mention
Too tender to waste
As Ariel’s forced ----
To come forth chiding
To wag hard fingers
Before wistful eyes
To bare realities
Loath to do this
Ariel simply must
Strike upon reminders
As Ileenas smitten
Too smitten to see
Love isn’t possible
NO ONE WANTS
Oops droopsy whoopsies
Nor labor’s mistakes
NO ONE DESIRES
Ileena’s inner love
Love isn’t enough
When there’s damages
Where splendor lays
Itself down in surrender.
By Lady Lost
Copyright © 1999
All rights reserved.
Library of Congress Copyright
International Copyright.
No permission to print, copy, download, redistribute, or display elsewhere outside of this website, without written permission from the author. Please forward all inquiries, comments, or requests to agent of the author, Gunther S. Vanludwick at svanludwick@yahoo.com
** Here's yet another one which uses the phrase droopsy whoospy in context. Again it is absolutely nothing in the world to do with juvenile body parts! It has nothing to do with any child. It has to do with adult situations and adult issues. It is completely expressing an adult alteration in very shy thus understated adult terms. And it is the business of the adult expressing these feeling to cope with them in her own way. The victim within this work is clearly a grown female. No child is listed as the cause, the cause and the end is adult in nature.
__________________________
5) Amazing and what truly excellent descriptions! This should be quite enlightening to any readers who may have been foolish enough to have any doubts. Do you truly believe the alleged perpetrator was of the opinion that this scam of his could work in light of such obvious interpretations? You'd be surprised, shocked really, at how many people don't take words and phrases in context, or look at the repetitions, and then apply some logic. "Person-in-situation," is a huge part of this context process represented within my works. But I'm glad you were able to dig up some of these works so that I could comment on them and define them specifically. Thank you!
6) It appears to me that you were harmed and as a result these poems were created? This is undeniably the truth of the matter. However, the crux of this is not where the fruit loop says it is and moreover this situation should remain my sole problem. Crazy person stalking intervention makes the problem worse for everyone! I stress the, "everyone," in this! This nut puppy was not and is still not invited into the picture. In fact, this nut puppy is nothing but a sickening perpetrator himself!
Copyright © 2002
All rights reserved
Library of Congress Copyright
International Copyright
No rights to copy, print, download, duplicate, or display elsewhere other than upon this specific website granted or implied without the direct written permission of the author. Please contact agent of the author: Mr. Gunther S. Vanludwick at svanludwick@yahoo.com
**As with all poetry, essays, correspondence and/or published letters, e-mails or other communications presented on this webpage, this work is a personal subjective expression of its author's own feelings, thoughts, beliefs, and opinions. This statement is in no way intended to invalidate or minimize the powerful and poignant experiences of this author. However, this statement is intended to indicate that creative expressions such as these written forms of artwork are derived from their author's own personal feelings, thoughts, beliefs and opinions.
__________________________-
__________________________
|
|
|
 |
|