WOLL HW CHECK #3
Woll – Buckley v. Valeo 1976
Mann and Ornstein – Myths and Realities About The Bipartisan
Campaign Reform Act of 2002
Complete and print out this assignment and bring to class on the
assigned due date.
Directions – answer the following in the space provided.
Directions – read each statement and list of answers. Pick the best answer and circle that choice.
1. In Buckley v. Valeo,
the Court:
a) decided that disclosure
of campaign financing was unconstitutional.
b) ruled that the First
Amendment does not apply to speech in campaigns.
c) found that senatorial
and presidential campaigns cost about the same.
d) drew a distinction
between campaign expenditures and contributions.
2. Under the Buckley decision, a candidate can
spend how much of their personal funds?
a) $1,000
b) $25,000
c) as much as they want
d) none
3. Under Buckley, contributions to a specific
candidate or campaign:
a) can be limited, because
they are not protected speech.
b) cannot be limited.
c) must be matched by an
equal contribution to the candidate's party.
d) are regulated by the
state court system.
4. After reviewing the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act
of 2002 the Supreme Court in McConnell v. Federal Election Commission
(2003):
a) struck down the law in
its entirety.
b) declared some parts of
the law to be unconstitutional but upheld most of the law’s provisions
regulating
campaign financing.
c) held that the First
Amendment did not limit campaign finance regulation.
d) applied the First
Amendment to campaign expenditures but not contributions.
5. In McConnell v. Federal Election
Commission (2003), which Justice wrote “ This is a sad day for the freedom
of speech. Who could have imagined that the same Court which, within the past
four years, has sternly disapproved of restrictions upon such inconsequential
forms of expression as virtual child
pornography…dissemination of illegally intercepted
communications…and sexually explicit cable programming… would smile with favor
upon a law that cuts to the heart of what the First Amendment is meant to
protect: the right to criticize the government”?
a) Rehnquist
b) O’Connor
c) Scalia
d) Stevens
6. Spending on campaign finance has increased over the
years because of:
a) inflation.
b) the growth of political
offices.
c) increases in the size of
government.
d) all of the above.
7. Thomas Mann and Norman Ornstein essentially argue
that the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002:
a) violates First Amendment
freedoms of speech and association.
b) weakens political
parties.
c) is unnecessary.
d) is fully in conformity
with the Constitution.