April 2, 1912. 

  IN RE INVESTIGATION OF ACCIDENT ON THE PENNSYLVANIA 
    LINES WEST OF PITTSBURGH, NEAR LARWILL, IND., 
  February 17. 1912. 
  ----------- 

  On February 17, 1912, there was a rear-end collision on the Pennsylvania Lines West of  
   Pittsburgh, near Larwill, Ind., between a wrecking train and a passenger train, resulting in the death of  
 four employees and injuries to eleven others all of whom were connected with the wrecking train, 

  This accident was reported by telegraph by the Pennsylvania Railroad Company on the date of its  
 occurrence, and after investigation the Chief' Inspector of Safety Appliances reports as follows: 

  This accident was caused by the failure of the crew of the wrecking train properly to protect their  
 train and by the failure of the engineman of the passenger train to observe and obey signal indications. 

  This division of the Pennsylvania Lines west in double track road, equipped with automatic block  
 signals which are operated with a full block overlap. Under this system a train approaching an occupied  
 block would receive a green signal, indicating caution, at the entrance to the second block from the occupied  
 block; a red signal, indicating danger, at the entrance to the next block; and a red signal, also Indicating  
 danger, at the entrance to the occupied block, 

  On the data of the accident, the wrecking train, consisting of an engine, a derrick car, a truck  
 car a maintenance of way car, a block car, a commissary and tool car, and a cabin car, left Fort Wayne,  
   Ind., at 4.27 A. M., with Conductor Spencer in charge, bound for a point some distance beyond Larwill,  
 Ind., 
   which is 27 miles west of Fort Wayne. When the wrecking train was near Larwill, it broke in two, and  
 Flagman Killian, in response to a signal from the engineman. went back to protect the train, When he come in  
 he did not leave a fusee or put down any torpedoes. After the train had been coupled up, It proceeded about  
 three-quarters of a mile and was then flagged by a track-walker who had found a broken rail. The train again  
 proceeded slowly, and stopped, about 900 feet beyond a block signal while a search was being made for. the  
 broken rail. Both the engineman and conductor of the wrecking train taw the flagman on the ground at the  
 rear of the train; but the flagman was not signaled or ordered to go back to protect the train. and it is  
 evident that he did not go back very far, although sufficient time must, have elapsed while the search for  
 the rail was in progress to permit him to go back far enough properly to protect the train. The flagman  
 testified that he started to walk back after the train stopped, and had gone but a short distance when he  
 heard the  passenger train coming. He started to run, and swung his Lanterns as the train approached, but  
 his signal was not acknowledged by the engineman, After the collision Flagman Killian was standing about 50  
 feet behind the passenger train. 

  Passenger train No. 5, known as the "Pennsylvania Limited," en routs from New York to Chicago,  
 consisted of an engine, one club car, four sleeping cars, a dining car and an observation car. On February  
 17 it left Fort Wayne at 5:01 A. M., six minutes late, and collided with the wrecking train at about 5:40  
 A.M. 

  At the time of the accident the speed of the passenger train was approximately 40 miles an hour.  
 All of the wrecking train, except the engine and the derrick car, was destroyed. and the engine and the first  
 two cars of the passenger train wore derailed and considerably damaged. The track where the accident  
 occurred is straight.  About half a mile cast or where the wrecking train stopped there is a one-degree  
 curve, and there is an ascending grade toward the west of about 1 1/2 per cent. At the time of the accident  
 there was a heavy fog and it was difficult to see signals more than a short distance away. 

  Engineman Bechtol of the passenger train stated that all signals were white until he reached the  
 red signal at the entrance to the block in which the wrecking train was standing. As soon as he saw this  
 signal he shut off steam and applied the air brakes. He did not see the flagman of the wrecking train or any  
 flagging protection except a red light which he thought was about 25 feet from the rear of the wrecking  
 train. 

  The fireman of the passenger train stated that Engineman Bechtol called out the indications of the  
 signals as the train approached them. The third signal east of the point where the accident occurred, which  
 should have indicated caution, was called white by the engineman. The fireman did not remember the next  
 signal, but the first signal east of the point where the accident occurred was called red by the engineman.  
 The. fireman did not see these signals himself. 

  The flagman of the wrecking train stated from time to time he noticed the signals after his train  
 had passed them and that in all. cases they wore red. The engineman of a west-bound freight train which  
 followed immediately behind No. 5 stated that he found the usual caution and danger signals as his train  
 approached train No. 5 indicating that the signals were working properly. After the collision the signals  
 were inspected by signalmen and were found in good working order. It is apparent, therefore, that Engineman  
 Bechtol of train No. 5 passed the caution signal and. the first danger signal either without seeing them or  
 incorrectly reading their indications. 

  All the employees involved in this accident were experienced men and were considered competent and  
 reliable. Conductor Spencer and Brakeman of the wrecking train had been on duty 1 hour and 55 minutes after  
 18 1/2 hours off duty. Engineman Bechtol had been on duty 1 hour and 45 minutes after 29 hours off duty,.