truthsavvy online
|
"The
heart of the wise inclines to the right,
but the heart of the fool to the
left." Ecclesiastes 10:2 |
The United States is
taking unilateral action against Iraq!
So far, it's a 90-member worldwide
"unilateral" coalition.
We are in a rush to war.
An 11-year rush?
Tough inspections can
disarm Saddam Hussein without invading Iraq.
11 years of inspections have done wonders so
far.
We should let the
inspectors finish their job.
We did. They didn't. We will.
Why fight? The Iraqi
military is weaker than in 1991.
But their biological weapons and chemical
weapons are much more dangerous.
There's no proof of
weapons.
We know they have 'em, we know they hide 'em,
and we have tape recordings and photographs.
What more is needed? An Iraqi rocket in
Martin Sheen's shorts? (Fact: Don't tell
anyone, but Saddam Hussein IS/WAS a weapon of
MASS distruction himself -- incase
you haven't heard! (Truthsavvy's
observation!)
If we invade, Saddam
Hussein might use those weapons of mass
destruction against us.
I thought you said Iraq didn't have them?
But terrorists might
attack if we invade Iraq.
Oh
so if we don't attack Iraq,
terrorists will never strike again?
(they've already struck dummy -- Truthsavvy)
We shouldn't go to war
without a UN resolution.
ANOTHER resolution? What about the last 16
resolutions? Shall we use them as wallpaper?
Or shall we use the same resolutions Bill
Clinton used in Bosnia?
We don't have a real
declaration for war.
It's called "Joint Congressional
Resolution #114."
We are giving 20 billion
to Turkey. We could use that money at home.
OK, we'll use that money to strengthen our
Iraqi border with Wyoming.
If North Korea has
nuclear weapons, why aren't we invading them
first?
Uh
hello
isn't that the point?
European leaders are
against the war.
The Reichstag wasn't attacked. The Grande
Place wasn't attacked. The Kremlin wasn't
attacked. And the Jerry Lewis Lifetime
Achievement Museum wasn't attacked. America
was attacked. And besides, except for the
tantrums of France, Belgium and Germany, only
three European nations aren't willing to
defend freedom. The entire rest of Europe is
with America.
The French don't support
the war.
Oh
did they surrender already?
Germany objects to this
war.
Germany objected to Reagan's
"attitude" towards the Soviet
Union. Of course, they objected to our
presence in 1943 as well.
Belgians are against the
war.
I can live without Waffles and ice cream.
USSR doesn't support the
war.
They are still angry over Reagan's brilliant
Cold War victory.
Polls show Europeans are
against this war.
Polls show Europeans believe their freedom
was achieved by endlessly debating in
marvelous dining halls, conveniently
forgetting their right to be pompous
blowhards was granted with American blood,
not fabulous wine and brie
We should build a
coalition with our friends
With friends like these, who needs enemies?
(Fact: We have built a coalition with our
friends. We found out who our enemies
were/are! Truthsavvy's observation!)
What happens if we can't
build a United Nations coalition?
Who cares?
But the UN is the world's
most respected governing body.
Not as respected as the US military.
America has always waited
until enemies attacked.
Now that oceans can't hold back enemies,
pre-emptive war is forever a necessity.
War will cost billions!
So
how much is YOUR city worth?
President Bush says he's
willing to violating the 1976 executive order
forbidding assassinations of foreign leaders.
As soon as the ink is dry on rescinding that
idiotic order, will someone please pull the
trigger? The line forms to the right
Many Senators don't
support Bush.
Are you speaking of the Senators from
Bordeaux?
Tom Daschle says George
Bush has a "credibility gap"
When was the last time we came to Tom Daschle
for the truth???
These problems didn't
happen under Clinton.
Actually, they happened. But Clinton ignored
them. Now, Bush will clean up his mess.
But Clinton didn't start
a war.
Unless his girlfriend was testifying before
congress
Bush 1st should have
taken out Hussein in '91.
That 1991 UN resolution forbade a march on
Baghdad. Remember?
Millions of peace
activists are demanding we stop the war.
Millions of Iraqi's are begging for us to
start the war.
Thousands of innocents
will be killed or injured.
That's a lot less than Hussein is killing
right now.
(Of course, there's only one man that needs
to be killed
)
Young Americans will die
in battle.
Would you prefer they die in skyscrapers?
Protesters have genuine
objections to war
Just like they did in Somalia? Bosnia?
Vietnam?
People are coming from
all over the world to act as "human
shields".
Quick, hurry, before the bombs start
dropping
This is about American
Imperialism.
So which country do we own? What nation sends
us their tax dollars? If America was
imperialist, we'd already own the entire
world. Who could stand in our way?
This is Blood for Oil
The only blood is the Iraqi people tortured,
starved and killed while Hussein builds
massive palaces to hide nuclear
weapons
all financed with Iraqi oil.
This is a racist war.
America happily endorses a multi-cultural
attitude towards anyone who dares to take
away our freedom. Regardless of race, color
or creed, we hunt them down and kill them.
A U.S. led invasion of
Iraq is a great recruiting tool for
terrorists.
Have fun recruiting people into oppressive
misery as they enjoy their first taste of
freedom.
An attack on Iraq could
seriously undermine and destabilize Arab
nations.
Destabilize the region? The sooner we topple
these oppressive 14th century terrorist
regimes the better.
Are we prepared for a
multi-billion dollar occupation?
Were we prepared to liberate Europe and Japan
in 1945? South Korea in 1953? Grenada? El
Salvador? Kuwait? The Eastern Bloc?
Afghanistan? Nations always love Americans
when we rescue them from tyranny. The price
of freedom is never free.
Polls show Americans are
more concerned about the threat from al Qaeda
than from Iraq.
It's not a war against Al Qaeda. It's not a
war against Iraq. It's a war against
terrorism. Anywhere we find it. One nation at
a time.
American opinion is
against the war.
No, it's not. A majority of Americans want to
fight now, not later.
According to a recent
poll
You know what? S`*/w those polls. We're in a
war against terrorism. If you don't want to
fight the b`/*/`ds, get the hell out of the
way. Go visit Paris. Or Antwerp. Or Berlin.
Or Moscow. And stay
there. Forever.
But this time, don't call the White House
when the heathens are at the gates.
Permission to reprint Tom Adkins' article is
granted provided the following information is
included:
Written by Tom Adkins, Executive Publisher
Visit
The CommonConservative.com
Copyright©2008
TruthSavvyOnline. All Rights Reserved.
|
|
|