"The
heart of the wise inclines to the right,
but the heart of the fool to the
left." Ecclesiastes 10:2 |
First
Cases of Separation of Church and State
|
First Cases of Separation of
Church and State:
1878 Reynolds v United States
1925 with Pierce v Society Sisters
1947 in Everson v. Board of Education,
1948 McCollum v Board of Education
Date:
Fri, August 29, 2003 5:42 am
In
1920 a small group of communist-leaning attorneys
that included Roosevelt acquaintance Felix
Frankfurter and Clarence Darrow formed a group
called the American Civil Liberties Union
specifically to promote social justice for the
underdog in the Americaproviding the
"underdog" was fighting the stereotyped
white, Anglo-Saxon Christian norms. In other
words, the group was formed to fight for
socialism by attacking the precepts of the U.S.
Constitution and fomenting changes in how the
Constitution was interpreted.
Five years after the group was formed, they had
secured only a handful of clients from the Red
Raids of the early 1920s, but no meaningful
publicity to let the nation know that they even
existed. About that time Tennessee passed the
nation's first Creation Law mandating that
schools in Tennessee were banned from teaching
any classes that implied there was any substance
to Charles Darwin's theories of evolution.
Within days of that legislation being signed into
law, the fledgling ACLU began running classified
ads in the newspapers in Tennessee seeking a
school teacher who would be willing, for $100, to
challenge the law by teaching evolution in his or
her classroom. Several school teachers answered
the ads. Among them was John Thomas Scopes
[1901-1970], a 24-year old freckled faced teacher
who taught at Dayton High School. A few days
after Scopes answered the ad, three ACLU
attorneys ascended on Dayton, Tennessee and
interviewed Scopes over soft drinks at Robinson's
Drug Store on Main Street in Dayton.
On May 25, 1925 Scopes entered the history of the
United States. Opening a copy of Hunter's Civic
Biology in front of his science class, Scopes
began expounding the Darwinian theory that man
evolved from the lower forms of life.
Dayton was stunned.
Within a few days a grand jury was assembled and
Scopes was indicted for violating the Creation
Law. This, by the way, was the first crime in
history in which the defense of the offender was
planned before the crime was committed.
William Jennings Bryan, Woodrow Wilson's
Secretary of State prosecuted Scopes. Clarence
Darrow, Dudley Field Moore and Arthur Garfield
Hays defended Scopes for the ACLU's first trial.
Darrow made certain, from the time Scopes was
arrested, that the national media knew there was
a showboat trial happening in sleepy, rural
Dayton, Tennessee. (If you have a copy of my
first book, THE BAFFLED CHRISTIAN'S HANDBOOK, the
birth of the ACLU and the Scopes Trial is
adequately covered in it.)
The ACLU, which has had a communist mindset since
its birth gained an aura of legitimacy when the
globalists began their covert operations in the
United States to erode the underpinnings of
democracy in America by attacking Christianity
which was viewed by the one worlders as the
foundation of patriotism.
In a previous email on this subject, I mentioned
that the first attempt to build a wall of
separation occurred in the 19th century, so the
attempt to create this wall of separation between
Church and State is not 30 years old, it started
in the 1878 case Reynolds v United States. The
separation issue resurfaced in 1925 with Pierce v
Society Sisters and again in 1947 in Everson v.
Board of Education, and the following year in
McCollum v Board of Education These cases
solidified the high courts position that a wall
of separation exists that prohibits any religious
exercise or displays of religiosity on any local,
county, State or federal property. (That wall of
separation does not seem to exist, however, if
your religion is Wicca, New Age or Islam.)
What is most interesting about the 1st Amendment
is that neither the Congress nor the courts can
constitutionally ban the free exercise of one's
religion anywhere. Nor can they legally ban free
speech providing that speech is not inflammatory.
However, the U.S. government no longer views free
speech or the free exercise of religious liberty
as it is granted under the Constitution, but
rather, it is construed under the UN Declaration
of Human Rights. (This time refer to WHATEVER
HAPPENED TO AMERICA?, pg. 464), The 1st Amendment
begins: "Congress shall make no laws
respecting the establishment of religion or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof..."
Note the restrictions here are placed on the
government, not the people. Now look at Article
13 of the Covenant on Human Rights: "Freedom
to manifest one's religion or beliefs may be
subject only to such limitations that are
prescribed by law..." Not, now the onus is
placed on the people. This reflects the
difference between true liberty which protects
the rights of the individual and socialist
democracy which safeguards the rights of the
community against the individual.
Yesterday I sent out an email to some of you in
which I referred to the fact that Stephen Breyer,
David Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, John Paul
Stevens and Sandra Day O'Connor attended a
seminar sponsored by the globalist jurists in the
World Court that was focused on co-mingling
international law with American law in order to
codify UN laws in the United States. While the
subtle substitution of Article 13 of the UN
Declaration on Human Rights for the first half of
the 1st Amendment took place in 1947 and 1948,
the adoption and incorporation of UN and EU law
by federal courts in the United States is an
ongoing process as the courts seek new avenues to
promote social justice by destroying the rule of
law in America.
Jon
Christian Ryter
THE
BAFFLED CHRISTIAN'S HANDBOOK - by Jon Christian
Ryter
Copyright©2008
TruthSavvyOnline. All Rights Reserved.
|
|