HomeArchive 1Archive 2ACLU ExposedGuest Commentary Web News LinksContact

I wonder what other qustions or actions would be “ABOVE HIS PAY GRADE” if he were to become President?

One question and one answer only, was more than enough to convince me that Barack H. Obama is in no way, shape or form, suited as Presidential material. But of course, I was convinced from day one that he was a liberal socialist.

Barack Obama, being questioned by Pastor Warren at the “Leadership and Compassion Forum” at Saddleback Church on Saturday, August 16, was asked the question dealing with abortion and the 40 million abortions since Roe v. Wade, “At what point does a baby get human rights in your view?”

Obama’s answer was both bogus, and evasive! Just pure nonsense.

“Well,” answers Obama,  “I think that whether you are looking at it from a theological perspective or a scientific perspective, answering that question with specificity, you know, is ABOVE MY PAY GRADE.”

When I heard his answer, I about fell off of my chair. What audacity!!

First of all, whether or not it is a “theological perspective or a scientific perspective” issue, is irrelevant. Theologically or scientifically, it is MURDER!  If an unborn baby is killed intentionally, by the hands of a surgeon, “theologically”, IT IS MURDER! If an unborn baby is killed intentionally by the hands of a surgeon, “scientifically”, IT IS MURDER! There is no ‘touchy-feely’ way around it.

Barack doesn’t know the first thing about the “theological perspective” of so-called ABORTION. God says it’s MURDER!  He surely doesn’t know the “scientific perspective” of so-called ABORTION. Scientifically, the unborn baby is cut into pieces with a surgeons' knife or a sharp instrument is stuck into its brain to kill it, or a solution is injected into the unborn baby and the unborn baby explodes. SCIENCE says…you do this to an unborn baby and you will KILL this little defenseless human.

Then this lifeless scumbag continues to make his case where he doesn’t give a rats you know what about the “theological perspective” point of view, or even the “scientific perspective” point of view for that matter, but rather his “women’s rights”-- "feminist rights" point of view on the issue.

He says, “But let me just speak more generally about the issue of abortion because this is something obviously the country wrestles with.”

"Country"? He means the "country" outside his little "country". You know, the "backward" country where Pro-Lifers live! It’s obvious that Obama doesn’t wrestle with it much!

We don't "wrestle" with the "something" Mr. Obama! We weep for the 40 million plus unborn HUMAN babies that have been brutally slaughtered because of evil souls like you. We don't wrestle with this Mr. Obama, because we know the judgements that are coming to those like you that harm and would do harm to one of these little ones.

He continues, “One thing that I’m absolutely convinced of is there is a moral and ethical content to this issue."

Evidentlly, he is "absoutely convinced" that he chooses unmoral and unethical for his choice. He is without moral standards or principles on this one.

It's like he is saying, there is a little bit of "a" moral and ethical "content" to this issue. Like there is two sides of this issue. One side of the coin (issue) is moral and ethical and the other side of the coin (issue) is nonmoral and nonethical. To Obama, it couldn't be moral and ethical vs unmoral and unethical. It is either moral and ethical or nonmoral and nonethical.

Seeing one side of the coin (issue) as moral and ethical and the other side as nonmoral and nonethical puts him in a neutral position. In other words, he puts himself outside the bounds of moral and ethical and unmoral or unethical. He tries to put himself in a "safe" position.

No, Mr. Obama, the whole content of the issue is MORAL and ETHICAL v UNMORAL and UNETHICAL....period! No 'gray' areas here.

You notice in this last statement, he ONLY confronts the “theological perspective” when he uses the terms “moral” and “ethical”.  Without the theological perspective, there would be no scientific perspective. God gave the “moral” and “ethical” perspective to mankind.  Science just used the term to describe the behavior of those doing science....wanted all to believe that everything science was involved with or in is moral and ethical and NOT unmoral or unethical.

Obama tries to spin this as if he knows the difference between right and wrong…  What a scholar he is. What a learned person!  Evidently, he failed in the HUMANITIES studies.  It’s obvious that he not only failed in “theological” studies, but in “scientific” biological procreation/reproductive fields of studies also.

He sounds so smart doesn't he? Wrong!!

I’m sure, like many males, he has been convinced by his “feminist” wife that her “aborting” a child is her business and her “CHOICE” alone. It’s HER body to do with as SHE wishes.  Theological or scientific perspectives have no place in the feminist movement.  They are irrelevant and have no bearing on or connection with the subject of HER body and what she wants to do with either giving birth or "aborting" \her unborn child.

As I’ve said many times, it isn’t the idea or issue of women being EQUAL with MEN, that the feminist movement is after.  It is women wanting MEN to be equal with them. 

 As you may notice, Obama fails to use the term (scientifically or theologically) “infanticide”, which means, 1) a person who murders an infant or 2) murdering an infant.

It is well known that Obama is the only elected official on record to ever vote in favor of denying life-saving medical care to children who had been born, that were still alive, after a botched-"abortion" and struggling for life.

He is ignoring the moral issue, the theological issue, the scientific issue and the ethical issue.  But, he sure isn’t ignoring the feminist movement, the women's rights' issue.

His only concern is womens' rights and NOT baby's HUMAN rights. To Obama, a baby isn't HUMAN until after "IT" is born and therefore has no HUMAN rights before birth.

Secondly, if this SIMPLE question on when human life begins or at what point does a baby get human rights, (theologically, morally, ethically, or scientifically) is “ABOVE HIS PAY GRADE”, then we are in deep you-know-what.  If this question is so DIFFICULT for this man to answer, then this man needs to stop his campaigning and fade into the sunset.  In the desert preferably!

Any question Obama could possibly ever answer has to be answered with “THIS IS ABOVE MY PAY GRADE”. PERIOD!!

He would have to use this same heap of dung of an answer for ALL other issues and questions he will be asked or confronted with.

QUESTION: Are you for or against our victory in Iraq and Afghanistan?

ANSWER: “This is “ABOVE MY PAY GRADE”!

QUESTION: Are you for fighting, killing and defeating terrorists around the world?

ANSWER: This is “ABOVE MY PAY GRADE”!

Etcetera, Etcetera, Etcetera....

This man is so full of you know what, that anyone with half a brain can see right through him and his socialist agenda.

I CAN NOT BELIEVE THIS MAN HAS ANY DEGREE(s) FROM ANY UNIVERSITY IN AMERICA. MUCHLESS QUALIFY TO BE THE COMMANDER- IN-CHIEF OF THE UNITED STATES.

I can not believe Americans are as stupid as he is, to vote for him. This man is pure evil!