"The
heart of the wise
inclines to the right,
but the heart of the fool
to the left."
Ecclesiastes 10:2 |
The
Porn Industry And The
ACLU
|
The ACLU of
Florida and Washington speak with
forked tongue of a rattlesnake on
the pornographic/child porn
subject. They are liars pure and
simple.
Here's what they say about porn,
child porn and freedom of speech.
The ACLU says they do not support
pornography, but they do oppose
virtually ALL forms of
censorship. ALL FORMS of
censorship...even
"child" porn
censorship.
They "claim" their
policy is that possessing
pornographic material should not
itself be a crime. Including
"child" pornographic
material.
The ACLU says that the "best
way to combat child pornography
is for the government to
prosecute those who exploit
children by making pornography
and we strongly agree with the
enforcement of such
prosecutions."
Let's see if they are telling the
truth. I think you'll find that
they have no truth in what they
claim.
They're telling us that it's NOT
okay to make (Produce/production)
child porn photos but it's okay
to have child porn photos? It's
NOT okay to make
(Produce/Production) child porn
video's but it's okay to have
these child porn video's
in your possession.
But! "We OPPOSE ALL FORMS OF
CENSORSHIP"...
"ALL FORMS"
Maybe I've been under the sun
lamp to long!
How can it be wrong to exploit
children one way and not another?
A child is "exploited"
both ways. Producing it and
possessing it. Why would it be
worse to produce (production)
child porn than it is to possess
this production of child porn?
Seems to me that a child is
exploited in front of a camera as
well as off the camera.
You can be sure that if the ACLU
believes that possessing child
porn should be protected by
"freedom of speech",
they will protect the perverts
exploiting a child because of
their "freedom of
speech". "ALL
FORMS" remember!
NOW HERE IS THE KICKER FOLKS!
We've heard what the ACLU's
Florida chapter has said:
("...prosecute those who
exploit children by making
(producing) pornography").
Now here is what the ACLU of
Washington has to say about it!
HERE'S THE KICKER!
You will see the sleezy perverted
minds of the ACLU in action. A
lying tongue of a rattlesnake
speaks volumes.
"The ACLU-W continues to
believe that there should also be
no criminal or civil penalties
for production or distribution of
"obscene" or
"indecent" material,
including material distributed on
electronic networks to either
adults or minors. See national
ACLU policy #4 (Censorship of
Obscenity, Pornography, and
Indecency).
Would you like to read that
again?
"...including...minors".
MINORS = CHILDREN!
Let me put what they have
said...t-o-g-e-t-h-er!
No. 1 - THE ACLU says: "the
best way to combat child
pornography is for the government
to prosecute those who exploit
children by making pornography
and we strongly agree with the
enforcement of such
prosecutions."
Exploit children by making
pornography = PRODUCTION!
No. 2 - THE ACLU says:"The
ACLU continues to believe that
there should also be no criminal
or civil penalties for production
or distribution of
"obscene" or
"indecent" material,
including material distributed on
electronic networks to either
adults or minors. See national
ACLU policy #4 (Censorship of
Obscenity, Pornography, and
Indecency).
I sure hope you read this above.
Do you see the word
"PRODUCTION"?
"NO CRIMINAL OR CIVIL
PENALTIES FOR
"PRODUCTION"..."
First they are all for the
prosecution (criminal or civil
penalties) of those who exploit
children by making child porn
(PRODUCTION) then they turn
around and say they are against
the prosecution (criminal or
civil penalties) for PRODUCTION
OR DISTRIBUTION of child
exploitation...
THAT'S THE CONTRADICTION...that's
the DECEPTION!
Maybe the ACLU chapters should
get their stories straight
because they are pure DECEPTION!.
They just told me that they
support child porn possession and
they support producers and
distributors of the smut.
Did you get that? Forked tongue
of a rattlesnake - through and
through.
WHEN YOU OPPOSE ANTI-CHILD PORN,
YOU AGREE WITH CHILD PORN.
The ACLU doesn't need to be
"reformed" - It needs
to be abolished!
|